I get the worst mileage in my cars with Shell gas...do your local Sunoco/Shell stations use an Ethanol blend? Mine do, which kills power (according to my butt dyno) and mileage is noticeably lower despite similar driving routes/conditions. Have I mentioned how asinine it is to turn food into fuel? Sorry, I'll suspend my Ethanol rant for now.robj80 wrote:My findings were the best gas mileage came from Sunoco / shell...
The fact that you have the same route does offer some consistency to your findings. I very rarely fill up with anything besides Exxon or Mobil just because I get a 10% discount before tax and have for the 29 years I have worked for them (the exception being our 7 years overseas). That more than equalizes any differences between gasolines. So hard though to apply your findings to other parts of the country due to different refineries etc.robj80 wrote:These were my findings and in no way am I saying one is better then the other. I'm just posting my results. You should test the gas yourself. If you looking for greatest mpgs just calculate everytank. It's kind of hard if you don't have a set route like I had. Because once other things come into play it throws your numbers all off.
Using food for fuel is dumb to being with. It raises the cost of food because some of it isn't used for ingesting. More of it needs to be converted to ethanol and there is less of it for livestock.Rockhound wrote:
I get the worst mileage in my cars with Shell gas...do your local Sunoco/Shell stations use an Ethanol blend? Mine do, which kills power (according to my butt dyno) and mileage is noticeably lower despite similar driving routes/conditions. Have I mentioned how asinine it is to turn food into fuel? Sorry, I'll suspend my Ethanol rant for now.
The energy content in ethanol requires you to burn more fuel, therefore you get worse mileage. That's why you can't run E85 in normal engines. With the added demand in fuel, you need bigger injectors and a stronger fuel pump to get that extra fuel flowing.Mile High Versa wrote:Using food for fuel is dumb to being with. It raises the cost of food because some of it isn't used for ingesting. More of it needs to be converted to ethanol and there is less of it for livestock.
There are two calculation methods for Octane and you must go by what your manual says as Panama uses the other method. Fredmdamatas wrote:I always see that you all mention numbers such as 87 octanes... Does someone knows why we have 91-95 octanes in Panama? Funny thing is that my Tiida has a sticker stating "95 Octanes ONLY", so I always spend more than others in gas (people mostly use 91)... I know I can use 91 if I want to, but it might lower the performance...
Oh, and by the way, Shell would be my first choice...
what happens when the feds mandate that we put food in our gas tanks. There is also an issue in getting ethanol to market on the east coast due to lack of adequate rail transportation from the corn belt. So in all their wisdom, we have imposed a tariff on imported ethanol which increases the gas price on the east coast. I just love government intervention.robj80 wrote:Y Bottom line is if there wasn't corn in the gas I would be using alot less of it.