All those ruling elites in the Gulf have been put in place by the British anyway.The reason we are so close with those "rulers" is because we have been partners in moneywars with the British for a long time.So we have taken the place of the formerly British "protectors".
Many of these families weren't so "royal" too, more like crime familes before they were elevated by the British to be their Stooges.
Another interestign fact is that the only goverment in the Gulf, actively opposing islamic fundamentalists is Iraq.But our "allies" fund them.
One little amusing fact about disinformation in our media:
There was a cute little op-ed piece about "Sadam terror Camp" in a US "TV news" magazine:Full of cute little pics of masked men training presumably taken at that camp (when? by whom?). with scary music playing in the background.Fact is ,the Military camp south of Bagdad is training men to be part of Iraqs anti terror outfits, not islamic fundamentalist terroristsOn the contrary the untis that train at that camp have been known to FIGHT islamic fundamentalist groups.
OK the makes you wonder if Iraq shouldnt be our ally in the Gulf?
Food for thought isnt it?
Of course it isnt all that simple either.
The reality of geopolitics is that for better or worse, for the right reasons or not, some of those familes I critized above, are our only allies left there (do to our own doing, right up to the Gulf war Iraq was trying to become a client state of the US as well)
Those rulers are hanging on by their nails, to keep being allied with us, often against the wishes of their population, which is highly aware of some of our foreign policy hypocrisies.
When the US becomes unfreindly even if its just domesticaly, to those countries, we will make it even harder for those governments to make a foreign policy friendly to us.
Sorry for the book guys, but this is too complicated to cover in a couple of sentences.
Fred...
