Post by
s13_240_rb20 »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/s13-240-rb20-u87143.html
Mon Mar 10, 2008 9:22 am
Ok...here is the continuing story. Decided to start a new topic since my problems aren't matching the symptoms previously listed in the other topic.
Once again, here's the mods:
1990 240sx hatchRB20DET 5sp w/ecuWalbro pump (hardwired, battery voltage)Datascan is available for troubleshootingvac/boost gauge (-30 to +30)Fuel Pressure gaugenismo FPRNGKBPR6 plugs, gapped to .8mm
Okay, well...after fresh plugs, new pump, cleaning injectors' filters, etc....It runs. However, my brake and clutch feel extremely weak when idling. When the engine is off, my brake feels really good (I'll check the clutch later, now that I think about it). when I pump the brake while idling, I can see on the gauge that my vaccuum and RPM fluctuate.
My normal idling vaccuum is -17. My gauge is plugged into the back, top of the intake manifold. (is that a normal vacuum reading?) I have been told that the RB20 had a outlet for the stock boost gauge, but I am not sure if I am tapped into it. I DOOOO have one hose unplugged from that location so that I could tap the gauge directly onto it. At WOT, I do build up to 7psi. Fuel pressure responds and builds up to the building vac towards boost. However, about the time I get there, my pressure drops out.
Can someone show me where my stock boost gauge was plugged on? I don't want to "t" this line because there should not be a hose hooked up where the stock gauge was, so therefore I must be on the wrong vac-line. I'll be double searching the FSM even though I can't seem to find it.
And back to the brake and clutch issue: They are full of fluid. Both are weak when idling. These pedals are weak EVEN WHEN I have that vacuum line plugged on correctly.
But, in summary, any info about the boost gauge port location (preferably a pic or page number in the FSM), the expected normal idle vacuum reading, or the fuel building then dropping...will be greaaaattttly appreciately. In the meantime, I will be tinkering and experimently.
--TJ