S14tat wrote:is a 15mm spacer too much to use for hte front? i'd rather just sell both of my rims then and just buy some 17x9+15's in the front.
i remember reading around here that its not good to use more then a 10mm spacer as it would put more load on wheel bearings. not sure if thats true or not, but i'd rather not bother with studs and spacers.
If you use a 15mm spacer you can use a bolton spacer. No Studs needed, Waaayyy better than plates.
S14tat wrote:also r.w.240 i know your the wheel and tire expert, but if i was to run 17x9's in the front right, what tire size do i have to use? if i remember correctly, its like a 225mm wide. .
you can run anywhere from a 205/40 to a 275/40 on a 9J. It all depends on what you want.
On an S14 you can run a 235/40 Hassel free. a 245/40 isnt to hard on the front either with a 3ish camber.
S14tat wrote:i remember when you and sr20detpower was argueing about stretched tires but i wasn't paying attention then. so if my current 17x8 has 235mm threads on them, and i step up to a 17x9 with a 225mm thread on them, why would the 17x9 provide more gripe then the 17x8?]
SR20Power also thought that SRs sucked because they didn't have cam bearings.
Stretched tires enhance turn-in and make for a more progressive break-away than square or oversquare.
Some say this is at the cost of peak grip due to a lever arm effect on the sidewall which decreases load rating.
But, a wider tire is a wider tire and "stretched" tires to an extent feel loads better.
S14tat wrote:also how does running a 17x9 up front effect steering feedback compared to a 17x8?
Compared to the setup you have now it will feel a **** ton better turning in. All the tracking problems, will be from if you run a shorter sidewall tire.
S14tat wrote:i would probrably try to test fit the 17x9's +35 tomorrow and see how they fit, if they clear everything then i'll run them like that for alittle and just put a 10mm spacer later down the road.
Won't fit. even with AGXs. +25 would be waaaayyy close but would probably fit.