Hey I'm on Nico now!MeanGreenS13 wrote:reason #1 that i say the SR valvetrain is inferior to the CA is that its basicly made of GLASS... **** breaks really easy if you over rev... on a CA, i hit 9300+rpm the other day and it took it like a champ, on nothing but HKS256 cams and stock everything else. INCLUDING HYDRO LIFTERS...
go do that with an SR hahaha
where the f*** did that come from? we werent even talking about sr valve train we were talking about those sweet new rotary valves... dude ur taking the sr raging a little far its old... and we all get that you are in love with the ca but its not all that great. Sure people call it the rb of the 4 cylinders or w/e u said but if u really wanted to make power and have a nice motor then why not get an rb since the ca is so expensive and rare anyway... which its not jgy has 3 in stock and they are less than the sr's and rbs and pretty much everything else they have in their stock.MeanGreenS13 wrote:reason #1 that i say the SR valvetrain is inferior to the CA is that its basicly made of GLASS... **** breaks really easy if you over rev... on a CA, i hit 9300+rpm the other day and it took it like a champ, on nothing but HKS256 cams and stock everything else. INCLUDING HYDRO LIFTERS...
go do that with an SR hahaha
i meant stock douchebag hahahaSlowS13Silvia wrote:dave could
, just with a lame dual chain driven setup?MeanGreenS13 wrote:shim over bucket valvetrain design
Theyre not actually roller rockers. the rockers are set up with a rod called a cam follower that runs through the rocker arm. its used to engage the vvl which on the 20v head at high lift is about 12mm on the intake. This setup makes it impossible to pop a rocker arm off.MeanGreenS13 wrote:roller rockers dont really make that much a difference when you start bouncing them off the cam because your revving too high on stock valvetrain haha