stebo0728 wrote:Perhaps in the realm of probability you are correct, but in the realm of plausibility, we are both correct. There are scenarios in which our resources could be valuable. Perhaps their world was in peril, and their embarking was for survival, and perhaps they've drifted for 2 millenia, 1000 generations older than the ones who hit the launch button. And perhaps their ship board resources are low, or perhaps they are tired of their ship altogether. You can't assume that every scenario involves instantaneous travel, nor can you assume an sort of guaranteed moral or ethical superiority. Mankind is what they are, do you really think our hostile, impulsive, conquerous nature will be gone in another 2 millennia. I doubt it. If the visiting civilization has anywhere near the same brain chemistry we do, its likely that at least some level of conflict will result, even if it was not the original intent.
Your scenario also holds some probability as well.
However, if they have drifted for years, they would of again, most likely, adapted for drifting including their technologies. If they could live in space for massive amounts of time, think what we could learn from them in addition to their propulsion models.
I agree, there may be some ideological/ religious conflicts if we did encounter a new civilization because Hell, we can't even stand our own kind.