Post by
Q45tech »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/q45tech-u112.html
Mon Nov 18, 2002 1:58 am
We balance lots of tires on oem rims! We know from daily experience what tires hold up and what tires fail.
I have a game when someone is balancing a tire I guess what the machine will show just by looking at the BRAND/MODEL before it gets spun....[you can spot if the wheels are round or bent easily] you can guess the miles by the tread, you can see whether it came from the Q front or rear.
Q tires on oem wheels can vary from 5 grams to 100 grams [our clip on weights come in 5 gram increments up to 45 grams].I have tested over 50 oem wheels [without tires] and 95% are not more than 15 grams on any side out of balance! So I can safely assume that most of the imbalance is from the tire!
On a Q a 7 gram imbalance is feelable by almost everyone [they may not know what it is but they can feel a vibration]. We balance to 2-3 grams zero if possible. By the time the tire is remounted and the car is driven a day the balance is out on 80% because of the tire slipping on the wheel especially with new tires on used wheels [the mounting lubricant]..........one good 60 to zero brake [front] or one good acceleration [rear] does the balance in!
It gets better by 3,000 miles but by then the tires internal destruction starts. We have Michelin customer who get there oil religiously changed at 90 days and 3,000 miles along with rotate and balance...........they are usually within 5-15 grams total imbalance compared to other brands which may be double or worse in the same time period.
The SZ50 were a pleasant surprise not as good as Michelins but close..........some of the worst are Gyear [of the top 5 most frequent brands] and of course the national auto store brands are generally horrible as to the amounts of weight they require as they age!
You cannot assume inexpensive H, V, W, Z rated tires are good [that they maintain balance] because they have found a way to cheat the high speed test without failure by using weak thin sidewalls and light materials and 44/51 psi inflation to minimize the heat buildup.Just because a tire will accept the speed going straight with minimal load and slow acceleration doesn't mean it will survive braking from that speed [which is not tested]- they are not fools.
Tires are not tested with anything but ZERO camber to minimize heat build up. What do you think a Q -1.5 degrees does to them ......few would survive the 10 minute 149 mph test or the 130 mph test for H rated.
I would love to test all the S or T rated tires under the 108 mph criteria with a Q camber.........thank goodness most of you don't exceed 80 mph [indicated] in Summer heat with anywhere near a maximum load.
A change in balance warns you something is changing inside! I had one SZ50 that went from 10 grams to 60 grams in the first 1,000 miles we tested it on a Hunter 9700 it had 26 pounds of radial imbalance and upon Xray [at an aircraft retreading lab] showed that the belt had slipped and bent inside [bad glue job hangover Monday maybe?].........obviously this tire was returned and replaced................non of the other 3 or the replacement have had a problem in 17,000 miles.
Luckily most don't stress their tires thus have few blow outs except we see many sidewall explosions from hitting curbs on single ply sidewall tires [especially the 51 psi ones].
The old AVS I are 36 psi max tires which means the sidewalls are at least 22% [36/44] stronger [probably more like 100% since dual ply with reinforcement] than the 44 psi units...........the 51 psi units are ballon thin! but the rolling resistance is lower so they save gas thus you government loves them.
The tire industry is screeming that the government demanded high gas mileage tires now they are blaming the industry for failures [which the industry warned the government about prior to the redesign]..........]. so you get electronic pressure monitors to add more costs to the car to run cheap weak tires to save gasoline [1-3%] but it saves $36-$40 per car per year.......see the 5 year payback.