This one has been discussed a couple of times - so I'm not sure if there is anything new to add - you may even ruffle some Altima Coupe owner's feathers.coupenthusiast25 wrote:Hey again,
So yeah, a used (as in 30-50K miles) G35 w/ Navi or a new 2.5 Altima Coupe w/ Premium?
The Used G35 (if I look around) will obviously be cheaper, but thoughts?Like, for example: http://www.cars.com/go/search/...=true
Which looks really great... at $17.9K
I want a car that looks great (obviously both of these cars fit that bill), has great performance (I AM in Southern California, so I dunno if FWD is the best option, not sure though), and is decent at the gas station.
So, have at it!
Edit: Another question: does the 2.5 S w/ Premium Package have the HID lights? - I've heard conflicting reports..
Modified by coupenthusiast25 at 11:47 PM 10/3/2007
LBC - after reading your post all I could say was -LongBeachCoupe wrote:To each his own... Im not too excited about driving a car thats been out on the road for 3 yrs... i dont care about the miles... its not like its a sylvia or something...
Take all the extras you get and add them up... Who drives around a g35 and gets compliments?
2 people asked me about the car when i was at the post office today...
In addition, ive done some... uhh... interesting things in my last car... i wonder whose bare *** was on the seat before you bought it!
My boss at my last job was an a$$hole and a half, so i made it a point to slouch my pants and leave my bare *** on the leather of his 745....
I wonder who bought his car after the lease ended!
You had better get some quotes- I don't think one can automatically assume that a used G would be higher to insure. Now a used 350z might be more expensive just because it is a 2 seater ( I think this is one of the things that define sports car to a insurance company) Several things work in the Gs favor. It is a used car so the replacement cost would in many cases be less than that of a New Altima. The car has been on the market awhile with a proven safety record. Replacement parts are readily available for the G. Body shops have experience with the G etc.coupenthusiast25 wrote:Thanks a lot for all the input guys...one question, how would the insurance premiums be (This is my second year driving after I got my license) for the G vs the A/C?
I doubt my parents would agree to save some cash on the initial purchase if it will get totally blown out of proportion in the insurance costs...
Thanks!
Cali 2 Balti G, you are seriously funny. That was a funny, yet true, statement. I completely understand where you are coming from. I get flamed on numerous occasions because I got a 2.5S instead of the 3.5SE, and I probably overpaid for the 2.5S because I got it 3 weeks after the coupe came out. I just ignore people and you are absolutely right - I don't need to validate myself to anyone. My choice is my own personal choice. People have certain needs and preferences. I really like my 2.5S, even though it doesn't have as much hp as your G35 or the next man's 3.5SE. I am not into racing and would rather save money on insurance/fuel than spend more on a more powerful car. I just don't have a need for all that power, especially in LA traffic. Needless to say, I love the looks of your G35. Yet I still love my Altima Coupe, even if its a 2.5S. It will last me for many years. I think each person should appreciate the car he/she bought, particularly because that person probably bought *that* specific car for specific reasons. This forum is not a competition to see whose car is better/faster/cooler/etc. It is a bunch of enthusiasts getting together to discuss their cars, regardless of whether it is a 2.5, 3.5, or G35. Enough said.Cali 2 Balti G wrote:
LBC - after reading your post all I could say was -
When you get to be a certain age - you don;t need to be validated by others?
I get compliments on my car all the time - but that is not a reason to buy a car - Also where do you think Nissan looked to for some of the Altima Coupe styling signatures - especially the rear end and side profile?
To suggest that the G doesn't get compliments? Well that is almost as silly as putting your bare a$$ on someone's seat. Actually what you did wasn't silly it was plain nasty. What if you would have gotten caught? Like to see you explain that one. I'm surprised you would even admit on a public forum that you did that.
The used G versus new Altima is a good discussion when the posts have actual facts otherwise...
LBC - here is a picture of my G - honestly what do you think?
Maybe we can do a friendly comparison. Photo for Photo, spec for spec - and see what the forum thinks. My 4 year old used G35 (that may have had some nasty a$$ kid put his but in) to your spanking new Altima Coupe.
Modified by Cali 2 Balti G at 6:45 PM 10/4/2007
OK on behalf of all Altima, G35, and Nissan Pulsar owners - we are now kicking YOU off of this forum.coupenthusiast25 wrote:good job! I love this forum too
Okay, my dad was talking to me today and he suggested getting a used Audi TT (manual, that's the only way to go with an Audi sports car!) for much, much cheaper: like to the tune of $13-14K...
How does this rate up to the aforementioned cars - the G coupe and the A/C?
I think the biggest difference is FWD - if you need FWD then the Altima is your choice.Goon wrote:I get a LOT of snow coverage in Central New York State, so I went with the Altima Coupe. I've heard numerous stories from spinning off in the snow or rain with a RWD. So, the A/C would was suitable in all weathers.
I was satisfied after losing control in my family's Z3, and really pulled away the G35. If I were to live in Cali or some place that doesn't get snow, I'd stick with the used G35, especially if it's compared to a 2.5 A/C.
The 3.5 and a used G35, I'd choose it based on how much I can drive it around all year from the weather. They are both beautiful cars, but safety comes first. Maybe I can afford the G35, I'd take that on as a summer vehicle, but a convertible would be just as nice. :p
Side by the side, the bodies are the same size, when I parked mine next to a G35. It's uncanny.
I was obviously joking, nothing inflammatory that's why I even included the outrage of the Nissan Pulsar ownerscoupenthusiast25 wrote:haha, ummm sorry?
Really though, I had no idea about that inflammatory response, kinda new to this whole car-buying/racing/enthusiast circle...cut me some slack
Anyhow, thoughts?
Does this mean I still get a beer when you visit Maryland.mikemart wrote:Sweet car Cali. I take back everything bad I ever said about you! I don't care what everyone says , you're alright in my book. j/k----but f**king bad #ss car man!!
You hit the nail on the head because I kinda consider the G for me to be a 3 season car - I have a truck to drive when the temps drop and it snows. Inclement weather is where the FWD Altima would have an advantage over the G.Goon wrote:I get a LOT of snow coverage in Central New York State, so I went with the Altima Coupe. I've heard numerous stories from spinning off in the snow or rain with a RWD. So, the A/C would was suitable in all weathers.
I was satisfied after losing control in my family's Z3, and really pulled away the G35. If I were to live in Cali or some place that doesn't get snow, I'd stick with the used G35, especially if it's compared to a 2.5 A/C.
The 3.5 and a used G35, I'd choose it based on how much I can drive it around all year from the weather. They are both beautiful cars, but safety comes first. Maybe I can afford the G35, I'd take that on as a summer vehicle, but a convertible would be just as nice. :p