EXTREAMLY CLEAN 240SX ON EBAY!! 1990 > 46K miles

General discussion forum about the 240sx, and a great place to introduce yourself to the board!
User avatar
ILOVESILVIA(S13)
Posts: 521
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2003 2:43 pm
Car: 93 Ca18det Hatch, 03 Subaru WRX Wagon (daily), Subaru Legacy Limited GT (daily)
Location: Raleigh, North Carolina

Post

I was bored today and was browsing Ebay. I came across this really crazy clean 1990 240sx with less than 46K miles on it. Anyway, I just thought it was pretty cool to find a 90' 240 this clean, because as well all know, this is becoming very uncommon these days. I would totally buy this if I had the extra money available. :yesnod

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1990-NIS ... 588a076bfc


User avatar
TroubleBound
Posts: 1778
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 3:45 am
Car: 1992 240SX Hatch
Location: Richmond VA

Post

I think you meant 1990 < 46K miles. No matter, that IS a very clean 240. One owner and everything. But it is far from being an $8550 car. I like the lack of engine bay pictures. And holy crap lencore take it easy on the tire shine.

User avatar
Hijacker
Posts: 14373
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 4:57 am
Car: '92 240sx Convertible
'94 F-150
Location: Fredericksburg, VA

Post

It's a jersey car too. No matter how clean it is, I can guarantee I can find some rust on that car.

User avatar
EnjoiNismo
Posts: 1127
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 5:18 pm
Car: 93 240sx
Location: AZ

Post

Clean, but i wouldn't pay 8,000 for a single cam.

User avatar
ILOVESILVIA(S13)
Posts: 521
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2003 2:43 pm
Car: 93 Ca18det Hatch, 03 Subaru WRX Wagon (daily), Subaru Legacy Limited GT (daily)
Location: Raleigh, North Carolina

Post

Yea I hear you guys on not spending that much. Also, I totally overlooked the lack of engine pics. Also, I thought my usage of the less than symbol was correct. Less than 46K (>46k). Maybe I'm retarded but I thought I was right? If I'm wrong then I FAIL!!

User avatar
TroubleBound
Posts: 1778
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 3:45 am
Car: 1992 240SX Hatch
Location: Richmond VA

Post

Nah the big number(greater) goes on the big side of it and the small number (lesser) goes on the small side of it. No biggie though we knew what you meant.
http://www.mathsisfun.com/equal-less-greater.html

User avatar
pj
Posts: 1430
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 2:58 pm
Car: 95 s14

Post

8550.00 ? ...no.
someone should make one of those angry hitler videos, where he finds out someone is trying to charge him a stupid high price for a 240sx and while he considers it, he decideds hes dont a s*** and wont pay.

purestock240
Posts: 106
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 4:06 pm
Car: 240

Post

the crocodile always eats the bigger number

User avatar
King Ranzo
Posts: 11326
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 1:57 pm
Car: 15 Ford Focus ST
Location: Hollyhood, Flow Riduh
Contact:

Post

Wow. That's pretty damn clean. Not exactly worth 8550, but definitely worth some good money.

Hoffman5982
Posts: 1805
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:20 pm
Car: '95 sr20det 240sx

Post

I saw this a few days ago. I was just about to ejaculate when I saw the price and thought "get fu**ed!"

User avatar
Morph
Posts: 2520
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 9:02 pm
Car: 91 Sr Powered Coupe

Post

Wow someone is smoking some good sh*t

User avatar
fiznowler
Posts: 1492
Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 4:34 am
Car: 97 240sx se, 5 speed, paint, tan leather interior. vg30dett swap in progress.
86 300zx NA Daily Driver
Too many other nissans and parts to list!
Location: Springfield, Mo

Post

I am in the process of buying a 1 owner coupe that is pretty damn clean. It has the typical yellowing on the back bumper but other than that paint is damn near perfect. It is WAY cheaper than that thing and it is wingless, and doesn't have the sunroof. Is red really a rare color on those?

User avatar
charat
Posts: 291
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 2:05 pm
Car: 1992 Nissan 240sx SE, 2008 Honda civic EX

Post

ILOVESILVIA(S13) wrote:Yea I hear you guys on not spending that much. Also, I totally overlooked the lack of engine pics. Also, I thought my usage of the less than symbol was correct. Less than 46K (>46k). Maybe I'm retarded but I thought I was right? If I'm wrong then I FAIL!!
so you fail...

User avatar
fiznowler
Posts: 1492
Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 4:34 am
Car: 97 240sx se, 5 speed, paint, tan leather interior. vg30dett swap in progress.
86 300zx NA Daily Driver
Too many other nissans and parts to list!
Location: Springfield, Mo

Post

charat wrote:
ILOVESILVIA(S13) wrote:Yea I hear you guys on not spending that much. Also, I totally overlooked the lack of engine pics. Also, I thought my usage of the less than symbol was correct. Less than 46K (>46k). Maybe I'm retarded but I thought I was right? If I'm wrong then I FAIL!!
so you fail...
Wasn't this established already? You at least need a good fail picture or you also fail. :poke:

Gooch1971
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 3:10 pm

Post

To revive an older thread, I thought there might be interest in additional pictures of this car. These were taken when someone went to look at the car for me since I am 1,500 miles away. I make no comments regarding the car's condition.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Hoffman5982
Posts: 1805
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:20 pm
Car: '95 sr20det 240sx

Post

looking at the auction pictures and your pictures, I dont think its the same car. The gap between the hood and fenders in your pictures doesn't match the pictures on ebay. A gap that bad would have been extremely obvious

User avatar
scotty-2-forty
Posts: 1888
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 6:10 am
Car: 1996 Nissan 240SX SE KA24DET
Contact:

Post

Hoffman5982 wrote:looking at the auction pictures and your pictures, I dont think its the same car. The gap between the hood and fenders in your pictures doesn't match the pictures on ebay. A gap that bad would have been extremely obvious
Looks like the same car to me. Both the eBay pics and these show the same inspection sticker. The original post was October 5th, so between then and now it is possible something may have happened to misalign the hood; exactly what, I don't know. But if I was buying this car from 1500 miles away, I'd definitely bring that up during conversation with the dealer.

User avatar
Lobo240sx
Posts: 779
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 7:39 am
Car: 1991 Nissan 240sx Coupe SR2.35DET Redtop Build
Location: Austin, Texas USA

Post

Cleaaaan 240 but the rust underneath will kill that price if those pics are the same car. No more than 4k for that. Clean car, low low mileage, a dealer reason it being expensive. All of you looking for that original not modded 240 there ya go!! :D
They will get somebody though. Hopefully not one of us for that price! Sheesh.

User avatar
badbob2121
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 9:23 am
Car: '92 Nissan 240SXS13 Hatch ELLIS JUAN
'12 Ford Mustang GT RTR
Location: St. Louis

Post

i dont care how clean it is... i wouldnt pay half that for it.

Eddiemac
Posts: 176
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 11:01 am
Car: 93 Nissan 240SX vert
Location: Indiana

Post

They also dont come out of the box with overspray on the gas tank. The hatch full of water is a good sign that they didnt know their car. Pull the drainplug stupid, it needs a got mosquito sign on the donut. And for the love of god, simple green, purple power, and tire shine or clear on that bay if you want it to sell. The JDM hood washer/ spacer was probably cheaper than a thermostat. Paint and body look sexy though. Price = retarded.


Return to “240sx General Discussion”