
I'm flying out of Boston tomorrow. You can bet it'll take a while to get through TSA!300ZXttZMAN wrote:I wonder if its a terror attack?
To qualify as a certified act of terrorism, the incident must: (1) be a violent act or an act that is dangerous to human life, property, or infrastructure;300ZXttZMAN wrote:I wonder if its a terror attack?
It's not about who benefits, it's about person(s) upset and wanting to make others more upset than them or to punish others for whatever injustice that person(s) feels. Why try to rationalize an irrational event from an irrational person(s)? It'll make a sane person crazy.themadscientist wrote:I always ask myself, who benefits from this?
Looneybomber wrote:It's not about who benefits, it's about person(s) upset and wanting to make others more upset than them or to punish others for whatever injustice that person(s) feels. Why try to rationalize an irrational event from an irrational person(s)? It'll make a sane person crazy.themadscientist wrote:I always ask myself, who benefits from this?
Looneybomber wrote: It's not about who benefits, it's about person(s) upset and wanting to make others more upset than them or to punish others for whatever injustice that person(s) feels. Why try to rationalize an irrational event from an irrational person(s)? It'll make a sane person crazy.
I was in the gun store today when the story broke and the assembled "gun nuts" joked that somehow it would be tied to guns somehow. Way to deliver lefties.Ace2cool wrote:http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/04 ... the-right/
I know this isn't the politics forum, but seriously? Is there nothing that liberals won't jump onto the blame/ban game MINUTES after it happens? People died. That's all that matters. We should be mourning deaths, not playing the blame game. I mean, seriously, people. Pull your heads out of your a$$es.
Never said there wasn't one, I only said don't try to rationalize whatever it is. I took TMS's statement out of context thinking was trying to figure out who benefits from it.Rev_D21 wrote:There is always a reason there 'b0mber'.
themadscientist wrote:
There is always a "who benefits" because there is always an objective. You don't have to rationalize anything in order to process this sort of information.Looneybomber wrote:It's not about who benefits, it's about person(s) upset and wanting to make others more upset than them or to punish others for whatever injustice that person(s) feels. Why try to rationalize an irrational event from an irrational person(s)? It'll make a sane person crazy.themadscientist wrote:I always ask myself, who benefits from this?
I wouldn't call it "benefiting". You don't really benefit from vengeance...but who knows, maybe the crazies do get something out of it?WDRacing wrote:There is always a "who benefits" because there is always an objective. You don't have to rationalize anything in order to process this sort of information.
Very interesting. Did you see any officials in the plane?frapjap wrote:Have a flight out of Boston today. Got through security and am having breakfast. Flights are coming and going with no apparent issue. Loads of state police, dogs, and black SUV's outside, in the parking garage, and in the lobby. Assault rifles openly displayed, similar to Heathrow. Long TSA line, lots of personnel. Took about 45-50 minutes, but lots of officers around to help expedite. More state police in the terminals, but looks like I'll be getting out of here without a problem.
HOV lane was also not open this morning.
I agree.WDRacing wrote:Hmm...I see great benefits from vengeance.