No, I don't need extra issues to deal with, I will find a 91 or newer to use if I go this route.heatw wrote:just use the 89 then,
The differences aren't a serious problem in terms of a working manual setup, you'll just be stuck running the auto ecu from your vert, since you can't use the engine bits from the single cam. any differences in the lower harness from the single cam can be fairly easily sorted out.
I have dohc manual ECU, so I tried both auto and manual ECUs and didn't any difference at all, so I decided to keep auto ECU since it doesn't have limiter.heatw wrote:you'll just be stuck running the auto ecu from your vert, since you can't use the engine bits from the single cam.
It's not a good idea to put 91-94 speed sensor to 89-90 transmission. They ahev slightly different teeth. It'll work, but might go bad in the future.-RJ- wrote:The only thing I remember is you need the speed sensor off a 91 - 94 but you can get that at a junkyard for 15 bucks
nope, not same size... or teeth either, I believe.BiXLL wrote:would the sensor from my automatic work?
That's correct. You want the transmission with everything otherwise it's not easy to source missing parts.onosqv wrote:
nope, not same size... or teeth either, I believe.
idk. My car behaves much better with Auto ECU. I have a manual ECU, so I swapped them several times to see which one's better.mmm240 wrote:I picked up my manual ECU for 30 bucks. I think it was worth it.
$350.00 for everything including manual ecu.94_240sx wrote:
idk. My car behaves much better with Auto ECU. I have a manual ECU, so I swapped them several times to see which one's better.
Score!BiXLL wrote:$350.00 for everything including manual ecu.