If you leave in the resonator your probably right about size not effecting sound. Personally, I wouldn't want anything in my system that doesn't go straight threw on account of turbulance.Skidmark wrote:Just got done putting a GT-Spec on my friends kouki about 10 minutes ago. He was running a borrowed one for about a year, and just got his own. He's N/A for now, but going turbo soon, so you guys don't lay an egg over his sizing choice. He says he lost some bottom end torque with it, but gained on the top end, so I guess it all depends on what's more important to you. And the bigger is louder philosophy is garbage. It's all in the resonator, and the GT-Spec has a fairly large one. It's actually very mild, but it's all BASS baby. One of the best sounding exhausts out there, IMO.
You cant lose torque compared to stock with any size exhaust. You could take off your exhaust manifold and you'd gain torque over stock. The only discussion relevent with aftermarket exhausts is comparing them against eachother, because pretty much anything beats stock.Skidmark wrote:Just got done putting a GT-Spec on my friends kouki about 10 minutes ago. He was running a borrowed one for about a year, and just got his own. He's N/A for now, but going turbo soon, so you guys don't lay an egg over his sizing choice. He says he lost some bottom end torque with it, but gained on the top end, so I guess it all depends on what's more important to you. And the bigger is louder philosophy is garbage. It's all in the resonator, and the GT-Spec has a fairly large one. It's actually very mild, but it's all BASS baby. One of the best sounding exhausts out there, IMO.
Yes, you can. The reason this can happen is because too large of a pipe will allow the gases to slow down and cool in the pipe. This causes a mass of dense gas that causes backpressure. When RPMs pick up the gases speed up and this doesn't happen.InsanityInc wrote:
You cant lose torque compared to stock with any size exhaust. You could take off your exhaust manifold and you'd gain torque over stock. The only discussion relevent with aftermarket exhausts is comparing them against eachother, because pretty much anything beats stock.
Hey, looks like you failed fluid dynamics as well. Probably never took it from the steaming heap of misinformation going on here.A34D4ME wrote:Yes, you can. The reason this can happen is because too large of a pipe will allow the gases to slow down and cool in the pipe. This causes a mass of dense gas that causes backpressure. When RPMs pick up the gases speed up and this doesn't happen.
The trick is to use the largest possible diameter that will evacuate the gases before they cool.
Is wikipedia pretending?A34D4ME wrote:You're pretending again.
Is it professional racing, or club racing? Non-professional racing has noise limits. Also, you'll never get THAT huge of a pipe, since the area of a circle is pi*r^2, your cross-sectional area (and flow characteristics) increase exponentially with the radius.Skidmark wrote:Sorry, don't mean to interrupt egofest '05 here, but I'm curious as to why we don't see any small displacement N/A race cars running god-aweful huge exhaust systems. Most of the sport compact race cars I remember seeing down here at Road Atlanta are running somewhere in the ballpark of a 2" straight pipe, and that's on ported & cam'd motors that rev to high heaven. Just wondering if anyone has any input as to why that is so.
Skidmark - as I was attempting to explain. When you increase the diameter of your exhaust, you allow the hot gases to flow out with less restriction. However, this also allows the gases to flow more slowly. When you go overboard with the pipe size, gases slow so much that they begin to cool while still in the pipe. When gases cool they become more dense and require more force to push out. Basically, you get a dense "plug" of gas in your exhaust pipe that causes backpressure.Skidmark wrote:Sorry, don't mean to interrupt egofest '05 here, but I'm curious as to why we don't see any small displacement N/A race cars running god-aweful huge exhaust systems. Most of the sport compact race cars I remember seeing down here at Road Atlanta are running somewhere in the ballpark of a 2" straight pipe, and that's on ported & cam'd motors that rev to high heaven. Just wondering if anyone has any input as to why that is so.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venturi_effectA34D4ME wrote:Skidmark - as I was attempting to explain. When you increase the diameter of your exhaust, you allow the hot gases to flow out with less restriction. However, this also allows the gases to flow more slowly. When you go overboard with the pipe size, gases slow so much that they begin to cool while still in the pipe. When gases cool they become more dense and require more force to push out. Basically, you get a dense "plug" of gas in your exhaust pipe that causes backpressure.
I gleaned this from a website from some professional race car builders - I wish I didn't lose the link.
Anyway, they were probably more like 2.5" than 2" that you saw but that is the basic idea according to the experts.
And now, I leave you with idiot boy who will no doubt offer his own made up theory. Just ignore him and perhaps he'll go away.
dude, go with the BLITZ. i put on the blitz nur spec when i was NA. the gains were phenomenal! gains all across the powerband, you wont regret it. all i can say is f*** any exhaust smaller than 3".ken81590 wrote:so the blitz is only 3" right, im guessing that would be fine, and the blitz has no resonators either, right?
and is the gt spec or the blitz sideways?