I'm not a honda bandwagoner .that's a terrible misrepresentation of the bay. And I do love hondas...sil8tdrftr wrote:i dont think that most nissan drivers have an exhaust that sounds "like" a honda... if thats the case they failed... MOST nissan guys have swaps and run either stock or full "TURBO BACK" exhaust from turbo outlet all the way back.... and all ive seen here in the bay area so far is fail... "fart can"/honda sounds cuz nor cal is full of honda tekkers switching over to the bandwagon 240 scene...
masterflow or edlebrock they both sound like crap in my opinion... anything other than cat back or turbo back or header straight through is rice territory
which will sound nothing like the ka..XMSducksauce wrote:That's his SOHC 3.0L V6.
ever hear of a resonator?urcaptnspeaking wrote:...umm cat back has nothing to do with the exhaust sound/per say. Its where the exhaust starts: cat= catalytic converter.The muffler itself has the most adverse effect on exhaust note. If you want to get technical: diameter,cat,muffler,various things like even a header (as opposed to a manifold) and even exhaust tip can make it sound slightly different. Having like a 1 into two pipe would have a slight difference to a single exhaust. These things may make it louder or throatier,but hardly noticeable. there are more factors that just having a cat back that make the sound of a car.ALSO mufflers like ones you mentioned will make the car sound hollow and 'metallic'. It wont sound awful when idling, but in the upper rpm's it will have that sound "you dont like."3 inch would be too big for a stock KA. That motor doesnt need to breathe that much, and may actually lose performance (noticeable when dynoed of course, not really felt) Assuming you have a fairly stock KA 2 1/2 inch will be fine. If you are looking for a performance gain without the "rice sound" go with a high flow cat back with a muffler that has a subtle sound. Like some Apexi stuff ive heard. A little more muted, less prominant.Dart Izumi... is a little less common.Modified by urcaptnspeaking at 3:37 AM 5/15/2009
All i'm saying is that without a resonator you will not hit near as deep of tone as op is searching for ,and therefore everything you wrote is garbage to an extint without a resonator being mentioned when it comes to the tone of an exhaust.urcaptnspeaking wrote:why yes, yes I have. But i was just hitting on key points here. Im not going to write a book in a thread.
Problem is, he is looking for a v8 rumble out of a 4 cylinder. Not gonna happen unless you put a v8 in it. OP get an RSR Xmag. Sounds good, not ricey sounding, and you wont be setting off any car alarms.slyedog240sx wrote:All i'm saying is that without a resonator you will not hit near as deep of tone as op is searching for ,and therefore everything you wrote is garbage to an extint without a resonator being mentioned when it comes to the tone of an exhaust.
who's in a pissin match?I am not fond of golden showers really.All i did was add the missing factor in the post.Far from pissin match.A resonator will cancel some of the higher frequencies.You want a DEEPER tone, add a long resonator, that is all.blacksrjdm wrote:Yo pissing match...end it, IT IS OVER A F*CKING RESONATOR.
And I can piss further soooo. There.
Modified by blacksrjdm at 7:09 AM 5/15/2009
urcaptnspeaking wrote:No pissing match just info.... The OP will find something he likes.