In the spirit of The Fairness Doctrine, I give equal airtime to another article from said slag magazine.WDRacing wrote:Am I supposed to believe an obviously biased article in a slag magazine just because the author says so?
What? No wall of unreadable text like Telcoman likes to post?BusyBadger wrote:In the spirit of The Fairness Doctrine, I give equal airtime to another article from said slag magazine.WDRacing wrote:Am I supposed to believe an obviously biased article in a slag magazine just because the author says so?
The confirmation of what has been pointed out in The Rolling Stone article is in Romney's tax returns which he is failing to produce.WDRacing wrote:Not one shred of evidence in that entire POS article. Every time you post something it's like listening to Charlie Browns teacher. Am I supposed to believe an obviously biased article in a slag magazine just because the author says so?
If any of that crap were true that mongoloid idiot wouldn't be the first to uncover it.
Sorry Howie.
With any luck, Romney will figure out a way to take your SS and Medicare...not from everyone, just you.
Can you produce some evidence that shows you don't abuse your wife and children? No? We should talk to Greg about temporary ban you until you seek some counseling, domestic violence is a serious issue. Once you produce the proper documentation you'll be welcome back here.telcoman wrote:The confirmation of what has been pointed out in The Rolling Stone article is in Romney's tax returns which he is failing to produce.
I do not believe in the idea of the Nanny Internet - I think that most people are able to click a link and read on their own.szh wrote:What? No wall of unreadable text like Telcoman likes to post?![]()
Z
BusyBadger wrote:I do not believe in the idea of the Nanny Internet - I think that most people are able to click a link and read on their own.szh wrote:What? No wall of unreadable text like Telcoman likes to post?![]()
Z