No offense, but if you need suggestions on a reputable piggy back or stand-alone, you probably don't need to be digging that deep into your vehicle. Do you know how they work? You'll be required to invest even further in a wideband and a decent amount of dyno time.PMF wrote:Has anyone here done that- or can suggest a reputable piggy back? I am not too familiar with this particular modification, and I am sure if it is done wrong it can have many consequences down the road.
i Was going to say something along those lines... OBDII is more advanced and thus technically doesnt have as much safety factor built in. I think its because the chips are faster and can react quicker to things like detonation and such.Q45tech wrote:Based on the spread between the 4.5 liter and the 4.1 liter you will see that the 4.1 creates more % power per unit of displacement so the upside is smaller on OBD2 software. While a 4.5 early Q might gain 20-25 HP from a new chip, the 4.1 might only gain half that from a reprogram.
Look at the miniscule gain they accomplish with the new G35 [ecu reflash] to see how much of the safety Nissan has already used up in HP race.
In theory there is still 10% safety built into software that can be discarded by getting closer to ragged edge. Unfortunately US gasoline is now at such low quality that this 10% cannot be utilized.
An inexpensive method is to acquire a used MAF modifier [it intercepts the MAF signal and trims it leaner by negative 1,2,3,4,5% at specific rpms which should increase HP by the same amount above 5,000 rpm .
Google and Ebay "SAFC"
Partly, but also there are more sensors, including the "tree-hugger" secondary O2 sensors.elwesso wrote:i Was going to say something along those lines... OBDII is more advanced and thus technically doesnt have as much safety factor built in. I think its because the chips are faster and can react quicker to things like detonation and such.