...........ok jacka$$, the comment you made illustrates the ignorance and emptyness of the statement that came out of your mouth (or in this case, keyboard). i don't want to play the part of "i know more than you do" type of stuff , being that we are all grown ups here and we drive very sophisticated cars, but on the other hand, i can't resist calling you out on what you just said.DashingMax wrote:Ok! With all due respect, you and your muffler guy knows more about tuning the exhaust than all of the Ph.D engineers at Nissan?
well, i appreciate your question and here is what i found:M4T5 wrote:BTW, being you eliminated the crossover pipe, have you ever thought of why this would have been placed there to begin with????The crossover section (ex: H or X-pipe) distributes the exhaust pressure evenly between the two cylinder banks of the engine.
DUH!aidan2474 wrote:InfinitY? Don't they make speakers?
.........i'm not trying to re-invent the wheel here and i'm not trying to burst your bubble: but every engine sends out exhaust flows in pulses. i don't know of any combustible engine that sends out a CONSTANT flow of exhaust. i don't know what book you pulled that theory out of but i'd be very willing to read it myself. .....every engine puts out exhaust flows in pulses; it's a question of how "frequent" the pulses of exhaust are in between each other. obvioulsy, the time between the spent exhausts being sent out the back are going to be more "frequent" on a V8 than on a V6 . as you "unintentionally" just proved my point, a "true dual" setup on a V6 will not benefit you because the frquency of the pulses is not enough to merit an exhaust setup for each side of the block. on a V8 however, the frequency of pulses is more constant as you now have TWO more cylinders sending out more air down the same pipe. .....just to make a point, the famous and beloved V8 mustang has been doing "true dual" setups on their cars since the 60's all the way to the 2009 mustang. the mustang isn't of course a luxury car so the xtra noise from the exhaust is very welcomed.Sentientbydesign wrote:This violates accepted exhaust flow theory.
This mod likely allows for more high end flow, but sacrafices low end torque.
*shakes head*
I'm going to make the following claims based on what I've researched, not what I know to be true about your setup...
I seem to remember reading about the exhaust systems on the G35 and how most of the companies tried straight true dual setups and the car lost power. They had to add an X pipe in order to improve flow again.
Your setup would be ideal if an engine continuously pumped the same amount of fluid, but it doesn't, it pumps it in pulses.
+1 on that; crushed bent pipe is all that the shop had; but hey, for $80 and being able to break the tires loose more easily now with the VDC off i think was worth it.ken in az wrote:I just noticed they used crush bent pipe.....you need mandrel bent pipe to also improve power.
Your beloved point is incorrect.........The mustangs did have true duals up to the point of the 5.0L introduced in the 80's. Then like I stated before, they went to an H-Pipe set-up, then to a X-pipe set-up. Either way, these are not true dual set-ups like you set your M up.The aftermarket companies use X-pipes in their pipe designs for a reason. If they felt more power was to be had with separating both exhaust banks, then they would have done so. You need to add an X-pipe section in there man. An X-pipe crossover will work better than the OEM set-up and your current set-up.fiveliterbeater wrote:
.....just to make a point, the famous and beloved V8 mustang has been doing "true dual" setups on their cars since the 60's all the way to the 2009 mustang. the mustang isn't of course a luxury car so the xtra noise from the exhaust is very welcomed.
thank you. you now know something new. please drive through
Modified by fiveliterbeater at 1:18 PM 2/19/2009
ok sorry, i guess i read wrong then.Sentientbydesign wrote:I was trying to be nice, but since you obviously think you know more than everybody...
My comment about a continuous flow pump was an IF. Read properly before making remarks. If that 25% increase in pulse frequency is enough, then bravo. If not...
Flowmastermufflers.com/faq.html wrote:
Do I need to install an "H" pipe in my dual exhaust system?
Flowmaster strongly recommends using a crossover tube, otherwise known as an "H" pipe or balance pipe on all true dual exhaust systems. The crossover pipe equalizes the exhaust pulses and allows the sounds waves to communicate between both banks of the engine. Not only does this usually improve torque in the low to mid rpm range, it also creates a deeper mellower tone both inside and outside of the vehicle and helps eliminate "back-rap" on deceleration.
Is an "X" pipe better than and "H" pipe?
Over the years, Flowmaster has performed extensive testing of all types of crossovers and “X” pipes, and has revealed no substantial benefits of one over the other in street applications. We have experienced that some specialized race applications such as small cubic inch engines and /or restricted (small bore) carburetors, will respond well to the addition of an “X” pipe over an “H” pipe.
agreed; forgot about the H-pipe setup. to be honest i never really considered those things to be an H setup; given the only way the pipes interconnnect is through that horizontal pipe in the middle. other than that, both sides run straight out the back from each side of the block.M4T5 wrote:An X-pipe crossover will work better than the OEM set-up and your current set-up.J
+ on that......you're just forgetting one major thing: i'm not changing my entire catback system; therefore the research you did only applies to people redoing their entire catback system.if you read my original post here: zer...r-m45Sentientbydesign wrote:
Something we agree onnmgoodthing wrote:Speculation is glorious until you hit the dyno.
Only before and after dynos would show actual gains or losses.http://www.superchevy.com/technical/engines_drivetrain/exhaust/0505phr_exh/index1.html wrote:
Virtually all V-8 exhaust systems can be refined by the addition of a balance or X-pipe. These have two potential attributes: increased power and reduced noise. Extensive dyno testing on both of these factors has indicated balance and X-pipes are 100 percent successful at reducing noise. The reductions amount to a minimum of 1 dB to a maximum of 3 dB with 2 dB being common. As far as power is concerned, things are a little less certain. With engines between about 325 to 550 hp, experience indicates that in about 60 percent of the cases (mostly with balance pipes), the engine can deliver as much as 12 additional hp, with 5-8 being the most common. The other remaining 40 percent tested showed virtually no change in output either up or down. Based on such results, we can conclude that a balance or X-pipe is always a positive asset and never a negative.