you dont like dynojets, do you carl?Carl H wrote:on a:mustang dyno - 260 without any rich and retard defence (safc and the likes) 'tuned' 285dynojet - 300 untuned, 325 tuned.
who the hell measures BHP other than manufacturers? thats the biggest crock of **** measuring system ive ever heard of.redtop91 wrote:BHP or WHP?
The Dyno jet I go too dosen't read high. The Hub dyno I went to with my VE gave me 174hp and on the dyno jet with the same conditions I only hit 166hp. Hmmmmmm.Carl H wrote:kamin - not particuarly, they can give god awful inflated numbers.in the end a dyno is nothing more than a tool, used to measure for a change.but inertia dynos are horrible like dynojets, no loading at all...
same deal!redtop91 wrote:Touche. Crank or WHP?
260 whatever HP you will use.Kamin wrote:same deal!
outside of engine builders who engine dynos anything? you have to remove the engine to test that crap.
Very true and most magazine cars that we see are dyno'd on dynojet. So many time the HP numbers are greatly inflated.Carl H wrote:kamin - not particuarly, they can give god awful inflated numbers.in the end a dyno is nothing more than a tool, used to measure for a change.but inertia dynos are horrible like dynojets, no loading at all...
Sky80 wrote:WELL??? What were your numbers?
Most engine builders talk BHP and most parts got a BHP limit when you talk to the company selling it. If they talked WHP they would have to ask you if you ran manual/auto transmission, FWD/RWD/4WD and exact transmission loss.Kamin wrote:who the hell measures BHP other than manufacturers? thats the biggest crock of **** measuring system ive ever heard of.
hold on im gonna go prolly thursdayredtop91 wrote: