I'm pretty sure you'll see the biggest turnover in the House since 1932, and the largest win by Republicans since 1894. I'm on record with a prediction in my predictions thread.IBCoupe wrote:Q, what do you see as notable about this election?
Probably adds to my reasons for not voting. Even if I put in the time to research all of the candidates to make a truly educated vote (by my standards) it likely wouldn't amount to much. I currently live in Indiana (where everybody loves the bible, guns and despises abortions so the state generally stays a nice red color. But I used to live in Illinois (where God is dead, guns are the devil and killing the unborn is goal) so that state was firmly in the grasp of democrats. The more important determination I have to make is which state has the bigger crazies...heliochrome85 wrote:Congrats Dustin!
I lived in indiana most of my life and have voted there since i was 18. my vote was negated before i was even born.
From where are you getting the pollster reliance dates? How is it that you're justifying the 10-15% advantage to Republicans? You seem rely on news coverage and hype. I'd say that at least we have 1994 to compare to.96Qowner wrote:It has to do with which year you use to balance your poll of likely voters. The story for months has been the extraordinary enthusiasm of Republican voters this year. Most pollsters are using 2008 or 2006 as a model for turnout, but as we all know 2008 was an outlier with all the extra votes from blacks and youth. 2006 also showed no sign of increased Republican turnout. There is no year like this one to compare to. The data only go back to the 1940s and 1950s and there has never been a Republican bias this high. It was unusual to see a 4+ point advantage. This year, it appears to be 10 to 15 points.
I did some research last week, and most of the likely voter screens are using 2006 for a model, thereby showing a smaller bias towards Republicans than they should. I wanted to understand why the Gallup likely voter spread was so high at 15 points.
heliochrome85 wrote:Congrats Dustin!
Seems like it's real obvious but here I go.IBCoupe wrote:Q, what do you see as notable about this election?
FTFY.IBCoupe wrote:I have to point out that some of the founding fathers wrote and distributed pamphlets under false identities about their opponents, with wild accusations and charges that were patently false.