Dsport asks the question...SR vs. KA? Will the debate finally be settled?

General discussion forum about the 240sx, and a great place to introduce yourself to the board!
User avatar
KAbezon
Posts: 153
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:39 pm
Car: 1995 200sx

Post

I was wandering through the magazine rack at the grocery store this past weekend and stumbled upon this gem from Dsport. Looks like they want to try and compare the two, and maybe end the debate that has raged on for almost 2 decades. I doubt this article or series of articles will help decide anything, fanbois will be fanbois after all, but it is kind of interesting to see how it all pans out.

"Since 1991, the great debate among Nissan’s S-chass is fanatics has been between the SR20DET and the KA24DE. On the one hand, the JDM chassis’s were equipped with the turbocharged SR engines, offering out-of-the-box forced-induction power from the factory. On the other, the USDM variant received the torquey-yet uninspiring KA24DE engine. Many felt short changed by Nissan’s decision to equip the 240SX US drivers with a truck engine. But as more tuners researched and developed the KA24DE, some began to appreciate the potential that this powerplant has to offer. To really get a feel for the contenders, a detailed comparison was in order. A variety of factors including cost, peak power and dyno graphs will be used to evaluate the merits of each engine. In the end, a greater understanding of these powerplants will guide the enthusiast’s tuning decisions.

These DSPORT project cars will undergo further development in the coming months in preparation for the contest that will settle the debate once and for all. The first contest will be held on the dyno for peak power and torque. The second contest will be held on the circuit. A professional driver will pilot each car in order to get unbiased and consistent lap times for each vehicle. The third contest will be held at the drag strip, measuring both elapsed time as well as trap speeds. The data gathered in these categories will determine the victor. The final portion of the challenge will pit the vehicle owners (Richard and Jeren) against one another in a grudge match on both the circuit and the strip to settle the score. Stay tuned."

My money is on the KA


Modified by KAbezon at 8:53 AM 12/22/2009


User avatar
numbnuts240
Posts: 32380
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:17 pm
Car: 1999 Ford Exploder 4-door 5spd
1974 Datsun Fairlady-Z 250GT
2011 Ford Focus
2010 Mazda 3
Location: TJ

Post

there's a ka-t vs sr battle going on in gen chat.

User avatar
simmode1
Posts: 7918
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 4:51 pm
Car: Red '95 S14
Location: Euless, TX
Contact:

Post

God, I hope their KA-T builder knows what he's doing. I'd hate to see a hole where the #3 piston used to be splashed across this magazine because of a crap tune.

User avatar
KAbezon
Posts: 153
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:39 pm
Car: 1995 200sx

Post

The KA will be built by Jeren Walker, DSPORT's Technical editor.

This is what he said about the competition:

"Now representing the KA24, it's my goal to go above and beyond to take out the SR20 and Richard Fong. For the DSPORT readers who remember my past builds, you know I will be pushing this car all the way. I had major doubts about the KA platform at first. But after a few bolt-ons and some insight from other KA owners, my faith is restored. As for Richard, I feel sorry for him and his S15. At the end of this he will be having recurring nightmares of my S14 pulling away from him."

What makes me nervous is he doesn't really know anything about the KA. I hope he has someone giuding him that knows what he's doing otherwise, I feel sorry for that KA

User avatar
KAbezon
Posts: 153
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:39 pm
Car: 1995 200sx

Post

Also some pics of the combatants:

Richard Fong, Feature Editor

Jeren Walker, Technical Editor

User avatar
sx moneypit
Posts: 8911
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 2:54 am
Car: 2010 Nissan 370Z
1986 Toyota MR2
Location: Memphis,Tn.

Post

Should be fun!My money is on the KA too!

User avatar
jbracy7
Posts: 1039
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 8:39 pm
Car: 94 GTS TYPE-M in a dozen pieces
Location: S.A. TX

Post

In short no this debate will never end untell all the motors are used up and destroyed then a new debate will come and we will all forget that we even cared

User avatar
martins_240sx
Posts: 1414
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 3:19 pm
Car: 1990 240sx hatch, 1975 280z, 2005 F150 fx4

Post

ka will win...even if he is an idiot, pound of boost to pound of boost the ka makes more power. it would be interesting to see how it would fare out if they were both put into a bracket were they couldnt exceed a power limit...say both cars could only have 350hp...im kinda biased though\/

User avatar
simmode1
Posts: 7918
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 4:51 pm
Car: Red '95 S14
Location: Euless, TX
Contact:

Post

KAbezon wrote:The KA will be built by Jeren Walker, DSPORT's Technical editor.

What makes me nervous is he doesn't really know anything about the KA. I hope he has someone giuding him that knows what he's doing otherwise, I feel sorry for that KA
Oh god... I hope he is either here on NICO's KA-T forum or KA-T.org with a Moderator holding his hand every step of the way. This guy needs to hit up Klattr, aka Mr. 400hp+stockblockKAMASTER...

User avatar
D-UNIT
Posts: 787
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2003 10:37 pm
Car: a 91' S13 (15.014 @ 94.56mph NA) KA-T

Post

^^sweet valve cover! I used to hate E motors but now I think they are sexy. You'res especially.

User avatar
KAbezon
Posts: 153
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:39 pm
Car: 1995 200sx

Post

I hope he does well, and I'm sure he will be getting help from someone who knows how to build them. I wouldn't be surprised if Ivan got a call to lend some expertise...and many others who know the KA and building them well

Also, I think this will not be decided by the engines themselves, but the suspension setup and the experience each driver has on a track...

Those 2 things have more of an impact of times, than how much power your making in all honesty, so I hope Jeren has that car dialed in, and knows how to drive better than the d!ck, I mean Richard in the S15

User avatar
sakuragi's-s13
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 5:32 pm
Car: 1989 240sx

Post

saw it on the dsport web, end of the article "see the mag for more info" bought the mag just for that article, SURPRISE, the same that was on the net. 6 buks to the trash. ***ing mag. GREAT comparison however

S14toRPS13
Posts: 2333
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:11 pm
Location: Back to CA

Post

The KA already has an advantage with the bigger displacement. Obviously if it's properly built and tuned, it should make more power. Most 240 ownders don't even have the funds to fully build a KA or a SR. I need to get this magazine, but I'm very limited in my magazine selections since I'm in Korea.

User avatar
simmode1
Posts: 7918
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 4:51 pm
Car: Red '95 S14
Location: Euless, TX
Contact:

Post

KAbezon wrote:Also, I think this will not be decided by the engines themselves, but the suspension setup and the experience each driver has on a track...
I think they should have the car's suspension and whatnot setup the same if possible, so that you could truely see the difference in the performance of these two engines. In the end, I don't want any fanboys crying "Oh the X motor only won cuz the car's suspension/LSD/chassis/whatever was setup better!"
S14toRPS13 wrote: I need to get this magazine, but I'm very limited in my magazine selections since I'm in Korea.
I dunno man, magazines don't really publish much technical info that you can't find for free on some forum, IMO. Not since SCC folded, anyways...

User avatar
sr20power
Posts: 1774
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2003 7:42 pm
Car: S14 Zenki

Post

Straight out of the Dsport magazine:

Sr20det attack Strategy:Level the playing field w/ increased displacement & reinforcing shortblock internals - Resleeve block w/ ductile-iron sleeves bored to 90mm - Tomei powered 91mm stroker crankshaft - Carrillo connecting rods - Mahle forged-aluminum pistonsImprove airflow w/ performance cylinder head - Tomei powered hand-ported cylinder head w/ combustion chambers - Tomei powered oversized valves w/ dual springs & titanium retainers - Tomei powered 270 procam camshaftsLarger Turbocharger - Increase size of turbocharger to take advantage of increased displacement & higher flowing cylinder head - Peak boost top-mount manifold w/ ex. wastegate - New Intercooler piping

KA24DE Game Plan:Reinforce bottom end w/ stronger internals - Eagle Rods - JE pistoneImprove airflow through head - Port Flow Design ported cylinder head - Complete Supertech valvetrain - Brian Crower Stage 3 race camshafts - Xcessive Mfg. Intake manifoldTurbocharger - Peak Boost top-mount manifold - T3 Turbo - Intercooler & piping - AEM EMS ECU

Basically it will be in these categories:1. Dyno2. Circuit3. Drag Strip4. Grudge Match on Circuit & Drag Strip (Richard & Jeren)

My vote is w/ the SR =)

User avatar
Chris28
Posts: 3159
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:18 am
Car: 92 s13 KA-T
Location: 757/919
Contact:

Post

Everyone knows that SR's are for fanboys and KA's suck.

JK, it will be interesting to see how this takes shape. In stock form the KA weighs more, but iron is a lot stronger than aluminum. If he can keep the number 3 rod inside the block then the KA is good to go. If the SR's head is built then that guy can benefit from higher revs. This is going to be a good read, I might actually follow this.

Edit: I just read the game plans.

The KA builder needs to ditch the Xcessive intake manifold and spend that money on larger injectors and/or more dyno time.

User avatar
Chris28
Posts: 3159
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:18 am
Car: 92 s13 KA-T
Location: 757/919
Contact:

Post

simmode1 wrote:
I think they should have the car's suspension and whatnot setup the same if possible, so that you could truely see the difference in the performance of these two engines. In the end, I don't want any fanboys crying "Oh the X motor only won cuz the car's suspension/LSD/chassis/whatever was setup better!"
The s14 looks to be a bit more performance oriented, I'm willing to bet he has more invested in suspension.

They are both probably lowered on coilovers though, not one-off race setups. I bet the extent of modification is energy suspension bushings or something small like that. Weight is also going to be a factor. Does the s14 weigh more? That should only matter at the track, but that's where the real race takes place. Who cares about dyno numbers when the rest of the car isn't up to par.

Future_gohan
Posts: 1297
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 5:57 pm
Car: 91 240sx, 91 vert

Post

lolll dsport, i'm gonna have to start getting they're mags again

User avatar
D-UNIT
Posts: 787
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2003 10:37 pm
Car: a 91' S13 (15.014 @ 94.56mph NA) KA-T

Post

SR attach strategy:90mm bore and 91mm stroke = $6000+^^ wow that almost looks like what my KA came with for FREE!!!!

User avatar
Murdered_T
Posts: 5169
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 7:27 am
Car: 1979 Datsun 280ZX byach

Post

there needs to be a fund limit for it to be affective, unless we have unlimited funds.

But yes, there is a battle going on in Gen Chat about this now...

User avatar
pauliedrft
Posts: 471
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 12:06 am
Car: 91 240sx

Post

I picked up the mag just for this reason (KA Vs. sr20 ) Seems to be a huge deal in our s-chassis community. Im probably going to get a subscription to there mag just for this reason . It should be great to see what happens .

User avatar
hilux30
Posts: 380
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 2:12 pm
Car: 2007 Tacoma 4x4
Location: GTA

Post

Block to block design I MUST go with SR, I've seen and worked on both and the bottom end of the KA is not designed to handle s*** loads of power. Yes the KA can make crazy HP but durability comes in mind. I'm not saying this cause I got and SR, personally I should of ditched both and went VQ...

hotrod240sx
Posts: 68
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 9:46 pm
Car: 1991 Nissan 240sx SE Hatchback with Hicas

Post

imo if they bore and stroke the sr to get more displacement that kinda takes away from the debate. most people doesn't have the funds for the stroker kit. if they left the builds stock for stock but only with better parts inside, stock bore and stroke i mean, i would put my bet on the ka. however if they going to bore and stroke the sr, that could throw alot out the window. remember when you increase stroke you generally help torque and drop the redline a bit. i would start to wonder what the aluminum block could handle in that area, and if they gonna try to still turn all the rpm like they could before, i think the cast iron would be better for the stroker. also if they do a bore stroke combo in the sr, just think what the die hard ka people could say then, lol, well they bored and stroked that kinda defeats the purpose. again i think they should do a build like most people would do turbo the ka and if they do a build just upgrade component quality, more of a real life build, not fantasy. i'm sick of ultra high dollar builds from all the magazines then them call it budget or doing a comparison.just my 2 cents

User avatar
Lonismos14
Posts: 1351
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 5:35 am
Car: 1995 Nissan 240sx, 1999 Chevy Hoe, 1996 Saturn Sl2

Post

If tuned right truck motor! FTW


User avatar
homeslicej2
Posts: 5446
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 5:46 pm
Car: 1990 Nissan 240SX S13 SR'd hatch

Post

I agree that "to level the playing field" by up-ing the displacement on the SR defeats the purpose, and I have an SR. There are so many other factors that will affect this "debate" as well: vehicle weights, suspension set-ups, tire choice, etc. I feel that for a truer comparo there needs to be two 240's with the same set-ups. Two S14 or S13's, same factory options, same suspension setups, same tires, same vehicle weights, etc. too many variables otherwise. Plus, each motor has it merits. I enjoy my SR, had I built my KA, I'm sure I would have enjoyed it too (even though it was a SOHC). I chose the SR bc at the time it made the most sense for my situation. I will be interested in seeing what they do and the final outcomes.

S14toRPS13
Posts: 2333
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:11 pm
Location: Back to CA

Post

homeslicej2 wrote:I agree that "to level the playing field" by up-ing the displacement on the SR defeats the purpose, and I have an SR. There are so many other factors that will affect this "debate" as well: vehicle weights, suspension set-ups, tire choice, etc. I feel that for a truer comparo there needs to be two 240's with the same set-ups. Two S14 or S13's, same factory options, same suspension setups, same tires, same vehicle weights, etc. too many variables otherwise. Plus, each motor has it merits. I enjoy my SR, had I built my KA, I'm sure I would have enjoyed it too (even though it was a SOHC). I chose the SR bc at the time it made the most sense for my situation. I will be interested in seeing what they do and the final outcomes.
I was thinking the same thing after reading the article from their website. Too many different variables to come to a good conclusion. I love seeing what the KA can do just as much as I love the SR. In the end, fully built SR's and KA's are completely different animals compared to what everyday people are driving on the streets. The debate will go on.

User avatar
spooled240
Posts: 6487
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:45 pm
Car: kouki s14

Post

this sounds really interesting but like some of you said there are many variables and no budget that I can see.

The main issue between ka-t and the sr route for 240 owners is the "bang for buck." Boring and stroking the SR kinda defeats the purpose of using the SR IMO...that engine will be a completely different animal than your typical SR.

If the SR is gonna get a bump up in displacement, I think it would only be fair for the KA to get a fully counter-weighted crankshaft, which shouldn't cost 6K and is will change the KA's powerband like a stroker kit would change the SR

I'm gonna be honest, I think the 1. dyno is going to the KA2. circuit is going to the SR3. drag strip is going to the KA


User avatar
simmode1
Posts: 7918
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 4:51 pm
Car: Red '95 S14
Location: Euless, TX
Contact:

Post

After seeing their build plans... I immediately lost interest in this story. Both motors will be so drastically modded, that you can never really tell which is best (which is subjective in itself), instead only which combination of parts prevailed at the end of the day.

IMO, what they should have done was have two nearly identical 240's suspension/chassis/LSD-wise and let the stock motors go at it. The KA-T should have gotten an OEM rebuild with only a metal headgasket and ARP headstuds to help out, of course, including boost friendly stuff like bigger injectors and whatnot. The SR should just do what most SR guys do: upgrade injectors/turbo/cams, tune it and hit the street.

This is exactly what is going on the NICO's Gen forum: WD's mild KA-T vs Koshin's mild SR. Now that contest should have some actual value to it...zer...vs-sr

Metal Angel
Posts: 291
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 1:56 pm
Car: 1990 240sx hatchback

Post

SR wins by default due to a broken KA. That is what I say will happen. Not that I have a lot of experience but I see a lot of broken KATs on this forum. Seems like its not as easy as boosting a honda.

User avatar
kpodj61240
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 11:11 am
Car: S14 Zenki

Post

simmode1 wrote:After seeing their build plans... I immediately lost interest in this story. Both motors will be so drastically modded, that you can never really tell which is best (which is subjective in itself), instead only which combination of parts prevailed at the end of the day.

IMO, what they should have done was have two nearly identical 240's suspension/chassis/LSD-wise and let the stock motors go at it. The KA-T should have gotten an OEM rebuild with only a metal headgasket and ARP headstuds to help out, of course, including boost friendly stuff like bigger injectors and whatnot. The SR should just do what most SR guys do: upgrade injectors/turbo/cams, tune it and hit the street.

This is exactly what is going on the NICO's Gen forum: WD's mild KA-T vs Koshin's mild SR. Now that contest should have some actual value to it...zer...vs-sr


Both are nice engines....my KA treated me awesome....so does my SR but I guess I will back the engine I have now. SOO SR!


Return to “240sx General Discussion”