Haven't went to the link yet, but based on what I said about some studies with the K&N versus a dry filter, it is a matter of average airflow over the life of the filter and partical size collected. An air filter could and should be looked as like an insurance policy when debating the cost. We all can easily see that a filter versus no filter is probably a good idea even though it will provide a restriction in airflow. The trick is the balance. I would look at various studies for all the oil based filters as far as partical collection size, surface area, etc. and compare those with the dry ones over the life span of the dry filters and then pick the correct one for you. The life span may be your tolerance to how often you want to change filters and have little to do with the actual cost at that time. For others it may have everything to do with the cost of the filters.
But just for example you expect to go 10k miles between filter changes. If a dry one gave better partical size collection and better airflow during those 10k miles is it the one you would select? If not and the wet filter filled that bill then you would take it out every 10k or whatever, wash it, oil it, and reinstall it. The last part really isn't all that hard to do labor wise.
I would say what is number one important is partical size, you simple want to keep fod to a minimum in any engine. Once fod is taken into consideration how long does a particular filter provide the desired airflow. Surface area was the reason the dry filter won in the studies I read compared to the K&N, which to keep this in perspective was a while ago and K&N may well have changed their filter designs to compensate.
The average airflow simply was greater longer in the dry filter versus the K&N. The K&N only had the advantage there at the very beginning. However the dry filter beat the K&N at the very start for partical size collection and the K&N only caught up later and later was also when it started to have its decline in airflow.
While the tests I read did not include the G, if this held true with the G then I would go for the dry filter. But it just may not hold true so then the other factors would enter in for me, the cost of replacement versus the cost of cleaning and initial outlay. You need to also remember to factor in the cost of performance lost as well since this is a number that can hit you at the pump.
Perry