Post by
aznkipz »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/aznkipz-u100969.html
Sat Nov 27, 2010 4:09 pm
DRIFTING, DRIFTING, DRIFTING.....
If a similar thread exists somewhere in this world about what I am about to ask, sorry. But I highly doubt there is a thread about the exact nitty gritty I want to know about this topic.
This thread mainly questions about the drift factor of a KA24DE-T in a 240sx.
First of all, I understand there are plenty and plenty thread on this topic but one thing that seems to be common is that they are mostly referring to just pure power.
This thread is asking the people who know very technical about drifting and about these motors. NOT ASKING FOR OBVIOUS INFORMATION ON THIS MOTOR.
My curiosity involves the better motor for drifting. I KNOW THAT MOTOR DOES NOT MATTER IN DRIFT, IT IS THE DRIVER, so do not mention this. It is the driver but my question is if the driver is the same and the driver is decent themself, are these motors so close to drifting that it doesn't matter.
The differences stated in many thread discussions:
KA24DE-T
Nissan KA Engine
KA24E (USDM '89-90 Nissan 240SX)
SOHC 2.4L (2,389cc)
Bore x Stroke: 89.0 x 96.0mm
Max Power: 140hp @ 5,600rpm
Max Torque: 152lb-ft @ 4,400rpm
KA24DE (USDM '91-98 NISSAN 240SX)
DOHC 2.4L (2,389cc)
Bore x Stroke: 89.0 x 96.0mm
Max Power: 155hp @ 5,600rpm
Max Torque: 160lb-ft @ 4,400rpm
- Indestructible block (iron block)
- More torque
- Lower max rpm
- 2.4 displacement
SR20DET
Nissan SR20DET Engine
Redtop SR20DET
(JDM '91-93 Nissan S13 SILVIA /180SX)
DOHC Turbocharged 2.0L (1,998cc)
Bore x Stroke: 86 x 86mm
Max Power: 202hp @ 6,000rpm
Max Torque: 203lb-ft @ 4,000rpm
T-25G turbo
Blacktop SR20DET
(JDM '94-98 NISSAN 180SX)
DOHC Turbocharged 2.0L (1,998cc)
Bore x Stroke: 86 x 86mm
Max Power: 202hp @ 6,000rpm
Max Torque: 203lb-ft @ 4,000rpm
T-25G turbo
Blacktop SR20DET
(JDM '94-98 Nissan S14 SILVIA)
DOHC Turbocharged 2.0L (1,998cc)
Bore x Stroke: 86 x 86mm
Max Power: 217hp @ 6,000rpm
Max Torque: 203lb-ft @ 4,800rpm
T-28 turbo
Blacktop SR20DET
(JDM '99-02 Nissan S15 SILVIA)
DOHC Turbocharged 2.0L (1,998cc)
Bore x Stroke: 86 x 86mm
Max Power: 245hp @ 6,400rpm
Max Torque: 202lb-ft @ 4,800rpm
T-28BB Turbo
- High max rpm
- Respond well to mods
- Built as a race inspired motor?
- Lighter
- 2.0 displacement
Differences stated in Super Street: Nissan Issue (September 2010)
Provided in the Super Street site
Bottom End
- The SR is a box engine design with an 86x86mm bore and stroke, while the KA is an undersquare with a 89x96.0mm. Due to its short stroke, the SR can turn considerably higher RPM speeds than the KA.
- the KA starts to see dangerous levels of engine vibration once it goes past 7600rpm. While you probably won't notice this driving around on the street, sustained vibration at high rpm over long periods, as in a race, means a very short-lived engine.
- But the SR block is not without faults. If big power is your game, the KA has a larger base displacement (2389cc) in comparison to an SR (1998cc). As the old adage goes, there is no replacement for displacement.
- The limiting factor for the SR here is the shorter deck height. You can only stroke it so far to where you hit a physical limit. Being a smaller displacement engine, it is also limited to how much the amount of exhaust pressure it can generate. This means that with the same size turbo on each engine (say an HKS GT-RS), the KA would be able to spool the turbo faster, theoretically hitting peak boost sooner than the SR would.
- Its cast iron block is built tough to handle abuse, but falls a little short with its puny rods and cast pistons. Its weakest points are its head gasket and head studs. The SR was built for boost from day one as its head gasket, head studs, pistons and rods can hold their own against mild turbo upgrades and increase in boost levels.
Cylinder Head
- From the factory, the SR head flows quite well. The KA head has large, adequate intake ports, but the exhaust ports are pretty small. Good thing Nissan casted enough material in the KA head to where it could be ported to flow comparably to a SR head.
- SRs are notorious for spitting out rocker arms at high RPMs. The KA uses a shim-over-bucket design that puts a direct link between the cam and the valve. What does that mean? You won't have to worry that you will have valve train issues at high RPM, like bouncing off the rev limiter drifting.
As you can see, there are two sides to every coin. Although many people have written off the KA as a POS truck engine, it has its definite strengths. The almighty SR is not without faults and limitations. So which engine is better? The real answer lies not with the engine but with how it is properly built. That might sound like something Yoda would say, but the power of an engine lies with proper preparation and tuning. Still not convinced? Lets see what the experts have to say about it.
Just The Tip From The Experts
ERic hsu of cosworth: KA; For a streetcar, there is no replacement for displacement. The KA head flows better than the SR and is only limited by head studs (which ARP sells) and head gasket (which Cosworth is currently in development of).
Naoto negishi of npd: KA; The difference in displacement, valvetrain design and cost/availability of donor engines gives it the edge over the SR20DET.
Eddie Kim of Dynamic Autosports: SR; This is because of the number and variety of parts available. Everything from engine parts to manifolds to engine management makes it an easy platform to work with.
Alex Shen of SP Engineering: KA; The KA's cast iron block makes it strong from the start. Since fuel management is no longer a limiting factor, it is a strong base package for making power.
Dai Yoshihara of Falken Racing: SR; In racing, engine reliability is a big priority. I think that tuners have an easier time making power on the SR, but I would prefer my V8 over them both (laughs).
Quoc Ly of Driftspeed: SR; I choose the SR because it takes less effort to make decent power and there are so many different parts available for it. Masaki Nakayama of A'PEXi: SR; There are tons of support for the platform. People have more choices in parts and makers.
Kenji Sumino of Greddy: KA; I built my first KA in 1996 because I wanted to be different and believed it was a better-designed engine to make big power. I still believe this true to this day.
Clark Steppler of Jim Wolf Technology: KA; Although the SR20DET surpasses the KA24DE in many areas, the KA can be improved to match or surpass the SR. The size of the engine and deck height makes it an easy choice when making big power.
So they discuss differences between the two motors but still my question isn't even answered within the expert's opinion. I want to know the differences in drifting if the driver has the same potential.
Is the KA24DE-T close comparison compared to the always used SR20DET in drifting?
Drifting factors
Now the big questions:
- How is the weight ratio with the KA24DE-T in a 240sx? Is it similar to the SR20DET in a 240sx?
- Is it possible for the KA24DE-T to last in drifting competition?
- Can the KA24DE-T be championship material in a 240sx as long as the driver complements the car?
- Can the balance and power be provided as such other drift cars have?
- Is the SR20DET or any other motors such as VQ35DE (my top pick, but pricey for competition), RB25/26 DETT, LS1 always better choices for the 240sx no matter what? - Again, if the driver's potential is similar.
Is the KA24DE-T that much of a worse choice compared to others?
AGAIN ALL IN TERMS OF DRIFT, nothing else.