drag coefficent??

Discussion forum for the venerable 510, and its non-US counterparts, the Datsun 1600 and Bluebird.
68bre
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 5:15 am
Car: 68 BRE 510

Post

Anyone already know the drag coefficent of a 510? I have a 68 that I just got a g-tech for and it needs to know the drag coefficent. (it is a 4 door)


User avatar
Razi
Posts: 28681
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 9:52 am
Car: Moo

Post

I heard it's somewhere around .49

Crookedsnake
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:12 pm
Car: Nissan Pathfinder

Post

That seems a little high.

My subaru forrester is at .37

In the g-tech manual it has instructions on how to figure it out by decelerating from 60 to 50... I have not tried it out.

At worst use what they have listed as a honda civic. The difference will not be dramatic.

I use my mind to benchmark and test my add-ons so once you don't change the settings you can gauge increase/decrease rather than overall performance.

User avatar
usafdarkhorse
Posts: 148
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:48 pm
Car: 1990 Honda NSX #382
1989 Nissan Skyline GT-R #2317
1972 Datsun 240Z
Location: Knoxville, TN / Akishima-shi, Japan

Post

Newer cars have MUCH MUCH lower drag coefficients than older cars such as your 510.

I would wager that the .49 is decently close to the truth.

The Forrester will be lower and the Civic will be MUCH lower.

sdzxdriver
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 10:37 am
Car: 1982 280zx

Post

Agreed, even the 240z is horrible at ~.46. And not to mention the scary front end lift that occurs when speeds get a bit higher. My friend's 510 had the hood fly up from the lift at a track day. After he installed an air dam, he hasn't had that happen. I think a front air dam is almost a must on these older Datsuns.

User avatar
usafdarkhorse
Posts: 148
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:48 pm
Car: 1990 Honda NSX #382
1989 Nissan Skyline GT-R #2317
1972 Datsun 240Z
Location: Knoxville, TN / Akishima-shi, Japan

Post

yeah it's basically required.


Return to “Datsun 510 / Bluebird”