Post by
motoguy128 »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/motoguy128-u46857.html
Wed May 28, 2008 6:59 pm
I still prefer to downshift, just my preference. For saving fuel, leavign it in gear uses marginally less fuel than neutral. How... well on newer cars with drive by wire throttles where the computer has complete control over the throttle. When no throttle is requested, the ECU can cut the iginition and fuel simultaneouly... it's electronic ignition, os they are completly sychronized... there is no possibility of detonation, lean lixture etc. This saves fuel because the power to run the alternator, oil pump, water pump and just the normal internal friction of the engine can be generated by the inertia of the car. It's free power. So on that long hill, you're better off leaving it in a high gear, then putting it in neutral.
I think you can feel the transition. When you initally lift throttle there is some engine braking, a few seconds later the engine braking increases slightly.
Also, it's not safe to operate a car in neutral, you have no ability to accelerate and emergency handling is compromised.
Even if you don't downshift, you still want to leave it in gear until the engine speed is under about 1500 RPM. At higher speeds, it defnitely worth at least one downshift... for example when comming off the freeway. A downshift to 4th or 3rd helps save the brakes and reduced the possibility of warping the brakes if you will be comming to a complete stop..