I'll agree with you about ethanol, but I'll have to differ on the subject of premium fuel.sooner4x4 wrote:Premium fuel: totally not needed and a big waste of money, but some people believe it is good for them. I am not trying to start a premium versus reg gas argument, but Versas do not need premium to operate properly.
Correlation does not equal causation. Premium fuel just resists premature detonation because it has a higher activation energy. This only makes a difference in high performance engines that utilize higher compression ratios.DejaWiz wrote:True, all modern vehicles have anti-knock sensors so just about anyone can run 87 octane rated gas regardless of compression ratio, but with my experiences with my V I get the best MPG using premium fuel.
Likely it's the fact there is quite hilly terrain on my daily commute and in stop and go rush hour traffic and a CVT, I need all the fuel economy help I can get.
1. Yes, I know a higher octane rated fuel resists premature detonation (pinging or knocking) than a lower octane rated fuel. What part of 9.9:1 compression ratio for the Versa did you miss when it was stated? That's a fairly high compression ratio given most fuel miser cars from 10-30 years ago had 7.0-8.5:1.Andrews Chalmers wrote:1. Correlation does not equal causation. Premium fuel just resists premature detonation because it has a higher activation energy. This only makes a difference in high performance engines that utilize higher compression ratios.
2. In the Versa? you're wasting your money. You are most likely getting higher mpg by using premium because your local 87 contains 10% ethanol & therefore has less energy content.
3. What's the price difference between premium and regular octane? I bet it is more $$$ than the mpg gains you get (so yes you visit the gas station less but pay out more).
True, engines from the 60-70's that were over 11:1 using leaded gas was commonplace, but then again, a lead additive is an octane rating booster in itself.Andrews Chalmers wrote:9.91:1 is not really "high compression ratio." Since you're referring to engines from the 1970s... I've seen engines from the 1970s that were easily over 11:1 and used leaded gasoline.
Comparing old engines with carburetors without knock sensor/fuel mixture adjustment is comparing apples and oranges.
Honda L15A VTEC uses a compression of 10.4:1, Toyota's 2ZR-FE and 1NZ-FE has a 10:1 and 10.5:1 respectively... by comparative measures, the MR18DE is not really "high compression."
But your numbers are amazing. Will you speculate at how the the premium fuel gives you such good mileage?
Modified by Andrews Chalmers at 11:40 AM 8/18/2008
except this is what I signed up for... lol FUEL ECONOMY 6-speed manual transmission - City 7.9 (36) 6-speed manual transmission - Highway 6.3 (45) Xtronic CVTTM - City 7.5 (38) Xtronic CVTTM - Highway 6.0 (47)sooner4x4 wrote:Back in the day, when we would keep our cars running correctly with timing lights, tach and dwell meters, etc., you would set the timing to get maximum performance and avoid pinging. If the timing was off a little, advanced a little too much if I remember correctly, you would back off the timing a degree or two and stop the pinging.
I guess what I am trying to say is, the classic way to reduce pinging was to retard the timing a little and/or up the octane. I am not sure if this is applicable to computer controlled engines, but I suspect timing adjustment would be the way a computer would arrest the knock.
Another classic reason for pinging, especially in a higher mileage engine, is the formation of carbon at the top of the cylinder. Not sure if this is a common affliction in modern engines.
30 mpg max in town? Sounds pretty darn good to me.
1960s maybe, but not the 1970s. The 1970s are The Era of Low Compression, thanks to newly enacted emissions control laws. That was the reason we had >7 liter motors making under 300hp and STILL guzzling gas.Andrews Chalmers wrote:9.91:1 is not really "high compression ratio." Since you're referring to engines from the 1970s... I've seen engines from the 1970s that were easily over 11:1 and used leaded gasoline.
Knock sensor hears knock and retards timing. Retarded timing means less power and poorer efficiency. If you're actually HEARING knock, it means the knock sensors are not doing their job. This could be because they're bad, or because the car is running so poorly that they simply can't retard timing enough to fully compensate.Driving Instructor wrote:How does the KNOCK sensor work? I think once it sences the KNOCK...it adjust the fuel. So does that mean when it "pings", it makes the fuel riccher?
Driving Instructor wrote:
except this is what I signed up for... lol FUEL ECONOMY 6-speed manual transmission - City 7.9 (36) 6-speed manual transmission - Highway 6.3 (45) Xtronic CVTTM - City 7.5 (38) Xtronic CVTTM - Highway 6.0 (47)
IS the 36 mpg 45mpg hwy Imperial Gallons or US Gallons?Driving Instructor wrote:
except this is what I signed up for... lol FUEL ECONOMY 6-speed manual transmission - City 7.9 (36) 6-speed manual transmission - Highway 6.3 (45) Xtronic CVTTM - City 7.5 (38) Xtronic CVTTM - Highway 6.0 (47)
CANADIAN...Imperialalonsorules8 wrote:
IS the 36 mpg 45mpg hwy Imperial Gallons or US Gallons?