Ahh, air from under the car, pulled through the wheels. An guess to how fast the car would need to be moving (wheel/fan rotating) to be "effective"?maxnix wrote:The blade design should be to evacuate air out when travelling forward and installed correctly.
Ferrari and others have done it from time to time. While the air extraction is negligible at sub triple digit speeds, the one thing you don't want to do is add air pressure under the car at > triple digit speeds.Rex wrote:Ahh, air from under the car, pulled through the wheels. An guess to how fast the car would need to be moving (wheel/fan rotating) to be "effective"?
Ahh, that brings up an interesting point.Would wheels with more (comparative) surface area allow for more efficient cooling of brakes? Radiation does not *require* convection or even the presence of fluids for exchange. That would mean that any benefits of high-surface-area wheels would be present at a stop (as Rex said above, the most critical time for brake cooling).Q45tech wrote:With a solid rotor [no isolated hat] wheel weight and conductance is critical in absorbing the excess heat to protect wheel bearings. Hot wheels are good.
Argh, I used the wrong term! I meant conduction ... but was sleepy enough (12:30am) that I wrote convection for some reason. Sorry about that!maxnix wrote:Actually, I think Q45tech was speaking of conduction of heat from the rotor, through its hat, then to the hub, and via the hub to the wheel.
While there will be some radiant heating from a hot rotor, conduction will account for most of the wheel's gain in temperature.