Best bet is to call him: 64 6 3555070Try about 9am NZ time, he's a real helpful and enthusiastic guy.joukaishou813924 wrote:Does he have a web site or any way to get a hold of him?
Thats not a bad price concidering the work.Whos Brian Cower? I will GoogleSuperHatch wrote:I spoke with Brian Crower a while back, (the person, not just the company) and he said he would be willing to make a set if there was enough interest. Minimum run was 5 cranks at 2500-3k a pop.
Just throwing it out there.
And about the flat plane crank... I agree the sound is amazing, but don't forget you'll need custom cams and stand alone to manage the new firing order. Not to mention vibrations are abundant in flat plane motors.
But i think a longer stroke would make more torque?joukaishou813924 wrote:For those prices ill give up on a stroker kit and just bore ans sleeve it.
But then iv seen Gen III's rev pretty hard with their longer stroke. Gen III Bore x Stroke: 99.00 x 92.00 mm VH45 Bore x stroke- 93x82.7mm (3.66/3.256in)Hmm, how many inches would i get if i bore out the VH41/45 to 100mm, then bump the stroke a little?? Just worked out 100mm x 82.7mm = 5.2lts100mm x 92mm (same stroke as GenIII = 5.78ltsI mention 100mm as i have heard someone here boring the VH to 100mmBart wrote:Thats a good pointMay better to bore the cylinders to give more capacity as mentioned above.This way the revvy nature can be kept with short stroke and bigger cylinders.
VK56 wouldnt be legal in a 1060kg Torana, need a 4.1 ltr block with 6lt guts hiding inside.Mettler wrote:Why bother? You'll end up with the same problem as the aussie Ford's 5.4 litre engines. They have 4 valve/cyl heads designed for the revvy 4.6 mustang engine, but basically a truck style long stroke bottom end, thus sacrificing top end RPM where the heads are designed to perform.
It'd be cheaper to put on some turbos, a supercharger, nos, or even to get a VK56 engine, than to screw around building a stroker crank for the VH45 & having to replace your rods.
Yeah, it's rod to stroke ratio...Chrispy300 wrote:The bore to stroke ratio actually gets better if you increase it to what you have noted. I thought there was another ratio that had to be considered when stroking a motor, can't remember for sure though