does anyone know of a company that makes a stroker kit?

Discuss topics related to the VH41DE, VH45DE, VK45DE, and VK56DE engines.
joukaishou813924
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 11:57 am
Car: 1946 Lincoln Continental

Post

I tryed to search for one but all I can find are dead links to websites that don't exist anymore, does anyhone know of a company that makes a stroker kit, and if not does anyone know how much work is involved in using a vk crankshaft?


John Dixon
Posts: 506
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 9:59 pm
Car: 300ZX-TT Z32

Post

You need to speak to Bryan Hartley at the headshop, New Zealand.I believe he has taken these up to 400ci with overbore and offset crank pin grind.If you're just after a slight increase I got mine up to 5l with an overbore to 98mm

joukaishou813924
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 11:57 am
Car: 1946 Lincoln Continental

Post

Does he have a web site or any way to get a hold of him?

User avatar
Bart
Posts: 394
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 5:13 pm

Post

Im sure this has been asked a trillion times so i appologise, but would a VK56 crank fit in a VH41/45 USA and JDM??I think there is a real appetite for a larger stroke crank for the 41's and 45's. But not sure if there are enough people who want one to keep the cost down?Maybe SCAT will do a few?

User avatar
Chrispy300
Posts: 405
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 10:27 pm
Car: 1993 J-Spec 300ZX 5 Speed Slicktop
Location: Brisbane Australia
Contact:

Post

There was some talk of the VK56 crank a while ago. Nothing definitive as far as I know. I think Ultrapulse was trying to source one for a while.

User avatar
Bart
Posts: 394
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 5:13 pm

Post

I dont understand the difficulty of making a stroker crank from scratchDont you need a lump of 4340 chromolly and a CNC lathe?I mean it would be difficult for me as i couldnt design and operate this machine but i know there are many who can.

User avatar
Chrispy300
Posts: 405
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 10:27 pm
Car: 1993 J-Spec 300ZX 5 Speed Slicktop
Location: Brisbane Australia
Contact:

Post

You need a pretty large hunk of steel and a while in the CNC. There is a huge thread on Hybrid Z about some guys who want to make a flat plane crank just for the sound of it

They seem to reckon about US$2k-2.5K to get it done. Which I reckon is reasonable, and I'm sure the cost would drop pretty quick if you got 5+ made.

John Dixon
Posts: 506
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 9:59 pm
Car: 300ZX-TT Z32

Post

joukaishou813924 wrote:Does he have a web site or any way to get a hold of him?
Best bet is to call him: 64 6 3555070Try about 9am NZ time, he's a real helpful and enthusiastic guy.

User avatar
SuperHatch
Posts: 907
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 8:20 am
Car: 96 TLC

Post

I spoke with Brian Crower a while back, (the person, not just the company) and he said he would be willing to make a set if there was enough interest. Minimum run was 5 cranks at 2500-3k a pop.

Just throwing it out there.

And about the flat plane crank... I agree the sound is amazing, but don't forget you'll need custom cams and stand alone to manage the new firing order. Not to mention vibrations are abundant in flat plane motors.

User avatar
Bart
Posts: 394
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 5:13 pm

Post

Vibrations worry me a bit on a street car.Is it that bad?But then you need custom cams, i got a programable EMS

User avatar
Bart
Posts: 394
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 5:13 pm

Post

SuperHatch wrote:I spoke with Brian Crower a while back, (the person, not just the company) and he said he would be willing to make a set if there was enough interest. Minimum run was 5 cranks at 2500-3k a pop.

Just throwing it out there.

And about the flat plane crank... I agree the sound is amazing, but don't forget you'll need custom cams and stand alone to manage the new firing order. Not to mention vibrations are abundant in flat plane motors.
Thats not a bad price concidering the work.Whos Brian Cower? I will Google

Aus450zx
Posts: 58
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 6:53 am
Car: 2+2 300ZX

Post

you'd also want new extractors because the scavenging will be different, the tuning of the intake manifold would probably be out as well?

joukaishou813924
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 11:57 am
Car: 1946 Lincoln Continental

Post

For those prices ill give up on a stroker kit and just bore ans sleeve it.

User avatar
Bart
Posts: 394
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 5:13 pm

Post

joukaishou813924 wrote:For those prices ill give up on a stroker kit and just bore ans sleeve it.
But i think a longer stroke would make more torque?

PyroTheGreen
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 11:06 pm
Car: 1990 300zx N/A

Post

There is a company called Paeco Inc, at http://www.paeco.com. They make many race quality parts, specializing in import vehicles. Their price list does not specify the price for a VH45DE stroker, but does say they can manufacture one for any vehicle given the specs for that motor. Based on their prices for 4 and 6 cyl strokers, I would guess roughly $2600 for an 8 cyl kit.

Keep in mind however, I have only as much as considered ordering parts from this company. I cannot find anyone who ever has or is willing to vouch for the quality of the parts or service provided.

carfrk666
Posts: 265
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 1:45 pm
Car: 1993 Infiniti Q45, 95 240sx
Location: CT

Post

how about going to a machine shop with a CNC and get a chunk of 4340 steel, make up some dementions on CAD and create a billet one?

User avatar
Mettler
Posts: 1445
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 4:05 pm
Car: HR31 GTS-8 coupe, VH41/45 Hybrid Transplant

Post

Why bother? You'll end up with the same problem as the aussie Ford's 5.4 litre engines. They have 4 valve/cyl heads designed for the revvy 4.6 mustang engine, but basically a truck style long stroke bottom end, thus sacrificing top end RPM where the heads are designed to perform.

It'd be cheaper to put on some turbos, a supercharger, nos, or even to get a VK56 engine, than to screw around building a stroker crank for the VH45 & having to replace your rods.

User avatar
Bart
Posts: 394
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 5:13 pm

Post

Thats a good pointMay better to bore the cylinders to give more capacity as mentioned above.This way the revvy nature can be kept with short stroke and bigger cylinders.

User avatar
Bart
Posts: 394
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 5:13 pm

Post

Bart wrote:Thats a good pointMay better to bore the cylinders to give more capacity as mentioned above.This way the revvy nature can be kept with short stroke and bigger cylinders.
But then iv seen Gen III's rev pretty hard with their longer stroke. Gen III Bore x Stroke: 99.00 x 92.00 mm VH45 Bore x stroke- 93x82.7mm (3.66/3.256in)Hmm, how many inches would i get if i bore out the VH41/45 to 100mm, then bump the stroke a little?? Just worked out 100mm x 82.7mm = 5.2lts100mm x 92mm (same stroke as GenIII = 5.78ltsI mention 100mm as i have heard someone here boring the VH to 100mm
Modified by Bart at 1:37 PM 1/14/2010

User avatar
Chrispy300
Posts: 405
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 10:27 pm
Car: 1993 J-Spec 300ZX 5 Speed Slicktop
Location: Brisbane Australia
Contact:

Post

How much power are you going for Bart? Isn't a TT VH45 enough?

The bore to stroke ratio actually gets better if you increase it to what you have noted. I thought there was another ratio that had to be considered when stroking a motor, can't remember for sure though

And Gen3 is LS1 for our American Mates

kingkilburn
Posts: 158
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 1:41 pm
Car: '93 240SX
Contact:

Post

With that kind of bore and stroke he may be able to ditch all the heat and ware of the turbos.

User avatar
Bart
Posts: 394
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 5:13 pm

Post

Only way i would ditch the turbos i got is to put larger ones on lol. Nope im keepin them, even if i get a chance to increase capacity.

User avatar
Bart
Posts: 394
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 5:13 pm

Post

Mettler wrote:Why bother? You'll end up with the same problem as the aussie Ford's 5.4 litre engines. They have 4 valve/cyl heads designed for the revvy 4.6 mustang engine, but basically a truck style long stroke bottom end, thus sacrificing top end RPM where the heads are designed to perform.

It'd be cheaper to put on some turbos, a supercharger, nos, or even to get a VK56 engine, than to screw around building a stroker crank for the VH45 & having to replace your rods.
VK56 wouldnt be legal in a 1060kg Torana, need a 4.1 ltr block with 6lt guts hiding inside.

User avatar
Mettler
Posts: 1445
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 4:05 pm
Car: HR31 GTS-8 coupe, VH41/45 Hybrid Transplant

Post

With an increased stroke crank, at a guess you'd need to modify or replace the factory windage tray too.
Chrispy300 wrote:The bore to stroke ratio actually gets better if you increase it to what you have noted. I thought there was another ratio that had to be considered when stroking a motor, can't remember for sure though
Yeah, it's rod to stroke ratio...

It may interest you to note that the VH45DE has almost exactly the same bore/stroke ratio as the Ferrari F430 V8.

User avatar
Bart
Posts: 394
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 5:13 pm

Post

[QUOTE=Mettler]With an increased stroke crank, at a guess you'd need to modify or replace the factory windage tray too.Windage tray change would be ok.Im thinking of dry sump in the future, so the tray would be important but the least of my worries. But yeah you have a good point with the heads designed for high rev.

User avatar
twoeightythreez
Posts: 88
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:54 pm
Car: 1994 G50; 1995 Caprice wagon; 1969 Buick sportwagon

Post

For those of us that want to keep the vh in the nearly 2000kg q45 (if you include myself, a baby seat, trailer hitch, toolbox, etc...yes, it does weigh that much), more torque is definitely welcome.
Besides, If a damn 600cid big block chevy can be built to Rev 8000rpm there is no reason why the vh would lose any of its revability, even if built as big as possible.


Return to “VH45DE / VK45DE / VK56DE Forum”