technoman wrote:Well Im still looking for the dyno sheet. I found one of them but not the last one that was done. The waight of my car is 2785. On the run that produced 196lb of torque. I don't believe it to be right. That engine Can't push that much torque. I can admitt that. The guy that set up the dyno put in my waight at 3250 which is way off. As soon as I find a way to scan this one I Know is right I will, But it was before the porting and the JWT ECU. Im going to post the Dyno I feel is the most accurate. 150Hp 144lb torque to the wheels. Because I don't want to post inaccurate numbers. SO FLAME ME IF YOU WANT.....
I don't care because I'm "Technoman"......
The weight of your car doesn't effect the torque read on the dyno. If you used an inertia type dyno, which I assume you did, then you are accelrating a known mass with a known inertia at a given rate, which is torque (a force applied at a distance, r, from the center of a known inertia mass, the roller). Weight does not play a part in it.
If you used a water brake dyno, then you are accelrating a roller (or rollers) attached to a strain gauge. The strain gauge reads force (lbs) at a certain length away from where it attached (feet). That is where torque gets the the measurement lb-ft (lbs multiplied by feet away).
If you used an eddy current dyno, then the inertia is electronically controlled by applying electrical resistance to the rollers turning. The more electrical resistance, the higher the moment of inertia. So the higher the moment of inertia, the more torque it took to spin the rollers.
Weight isn't a part of any of those scenarios.