glitched wrote:So I read in grassroots motorsports about swapping out miata computers because some have better Programming or whatever and they actually make better dyno numbers...
Anybody ever try this on nissans, or 240's?
modulation wrote:
I don't even know where to start.They don't change out the ECU's because they cpus are faster.They change them out because their maps are different.What is a map?Read:http://members.aol.com/dvandrews/ems.ht ... c.php?t=47
But seriously do you understand now?glitched wrote:
I know you were trying to help, but you dont understand that your post wasn't necessary.modulation wrote:
But seriously do you understand now?
My post is 100% un-edited in its original state.modulation wrote:
Also I've edited my post like 1000 times now but I don't see where it mentions that.. I'm fairly sure his first (unedited) post contained the words "faster processor" which is also where I got that Idea.
Are you a moron?If all Stock ECU's have the same maps (which they do in the areas you are concerned with) then how would switching out ECU's make your car faster?glitched wrote:forget it, can a mod delete this thread... I'm just gonna buy a couple stock computers and try em out at the local dyno myself and maybe provide some actual valuable information to our community.
What are you talking about?Cutting what out? This makes no sense..Vegascorbin wrote:glitched: As a part answer for you. Our 240 has the standard problem of cutting out at RPMs above 3,000 or 4,000 Depending on ECU. (We have swapped the MAF along with a number of other things but thats for a differant thread)
Because most companies have several manufactures for the same part (especially for electronics.) Even though the chips have different P/N their function or the data the store is the same...Vegascorbin wrote:Why when you look at the ECU with the covers off the program chip has different part numbers from one unit to the other?
It's not true. I just checked for you.Opened up Nistune, did a diff/compare between the AT and Manual Fuel maps.There is no difference in either the 1991 and 1993 years in any areas which would count for performance.danielsan wrote:try an auto ecu i want to know if its true that the fuel map it has will give you a small boost in power.
ah thanks for letting me know.modulation wrote:
It's not true. I just checked for you.Opened up Nistune, did a diff/compare between the AT and Manual Fuel maps.There is no difference in either the 1991 and 1993 years in any areas which would count for performance.
From the article that I read:modulation wrote:
If all Stock ECU's have the same maps (which they do in the areas you are concerned with) then how would switching out ECU's make your car faster?
Seriously what is your logic behind this?
The reason it probably works with Miata ECU's is that the late model cars have their maps tuned better then the earlier ones.
Modified by modulation at 10:14 AM 7/7/2008
Wow bro, you still haven't taken your chill pill yet?modulation wrote:Even if I misunderstood his question (which I didn't ) it's still a stupid question
You people don't know anything about ECU's and electronics and it shows.Stop trying to defend your ignorance and educate yourselves.
Modified by modulation at 4:09 PM 7/7/2008
glitched wrote:"Spec miata experts have found that miatas have a wide veriation in ECU tune ..."
See the word "tuned" in my statement? Different year/location ECUs in miata's have different maps.modulation wrote:The reason it probably works with Miata ECU's is that the late model cars have their maps tuned better then the earlier ones.
2. It doesn't matter what number of the part is, it still holds the same information. Once again if you don't believe me download the rom pack and count the number of bins in there for a 240sx s13 ka24de ECU. There aren' t that many. Then look at the bins with romedit and compare them. They don't differ in any areas that count for performance. Even different part numbers from the same manufacturer can do the same thing.For example part number SST27SF010, SST27SF020, SST27SF012 are interchangeable. Part number #27C25685 which was used for z31 nissan ecu's is no longer available so people use a eprom with P/N #27128 instead.It doesn't matter though, because they all store the same "computer programming." Which is all you need to mess with on the ECU. The "computer programming" is the tune (which can also be called the maps, the binary image etc etc etc.)Vegascorbin wrote:#1 again CHILL#2 The part number I am refering to is the paper p/n tag placed on hte ROM chip when it is programed not the Manufactuers p/n#3 My car cuts out for some reasion we hav enot yet found. The point at which it cuts out will vary depending on which of the 5 ECUs we have that is installed. I am not saying why only that this is what happens.#4. I have a degree in electronics and over 25 years in the field.#5 you are refering to computer programing which is completely differant than electronics.#6 take a vacation and chill for awhaile and please stop being mad at the world and taking it out on us.