Difference between '89 and '91 240sx

General discussion forum about the 240sx, and a great place to introduce yourself to the board!
User avatar
Fastback Jack
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 6:26 am
Car: 2000 Ford Explorer Sort, 1997 Fort Taurus GL

Post

Hello. I was wondering if anyone here knew if there was any significant difference between the '89 and '91 240 sx? I am looking at buying an '89 240 Fastback but my friend says I need to get a '91.

Here is a more detailed post I have on the same topic. It's in the car buying advice forum:zerothread?id=143824


Alfador
Posts: 3043
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 4:55 pm
Car: 1990 Nissan 240SX Hatch
Location: The People's Republic of Taxachusetts
Contact:

Post

There wont be much of a difference except for age maybe and a few little d!ck things. '92 is when they started putting in the KA24DE is I'm not mistaken so maybe your friend was referring to that. Other than that I cant think of any possibly reason why one would be recommended over the other except for personal preference.

nab911
Posts: 2438
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 9:33 am
Car: 93 Nissan 240SX SE

Post

Lol heres a short list even though you should search:

91 differences:Front bumperka24deMotor made many engine differencesGauge cluster is differentLSD and HICAS became optionsIf your doing a motor swap, get a 91 plus.

User avatar
GhostDriver
Posts: 2316
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:14 am
Car: 1991 Nissan 240SX RMS13

Post

New motor and front fascia. The KA24DE was introduced in '91. No biggie.

User avatar
Bosrudorfer
Posts: 997
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 4:48 pm
Car: S14

Post

During the first generation, three body styles were available: fastback, coupe, and convertible. The coupe is closely related to the Japanese-market Silvia except for having retractable headlamps. The fastback is closely related to the Japanese-market 180SX. The convertible, introduced in 1992, was exclusive to North America and was the only body style available in 1994. The convertible was partially assembled in Japan, with final assembly taking place in the California facilities of American Specialty Cars (ASC). All S13 240SXs were largely similar with differences between trim lines (XE, SE, LE, etc.) being mainly cosmetic (1989-1990 240sx's are considered the "pignose"). The lone exception, the 91-93 SE fastbacks, had an exclusive optional sport package containing a stiffer suspension, a limited-slip differential, and SUPER-HICAS 4-wheel steering.

The S13 was known for its sharp steering/handling (thanks to a front strut, rear multilink suspension and light weight (2600lb) but was regarded in the automotive press as being underpowered. The Nissan KA24E engine, while durable, was a heavy, iron-block unit that produced meager power for its size 140–155 hp (104–115 kW), but with slight improvement in the form of a 16-valve twin-cam KA24DE in 1991. This engine is the main distinction between North America's 240SX and world-market Silvia/180SX. As the cars have aged, Japanese SR20DET engine swaps have become an increasingly popular 240SX modification. At the same time, a large community has developed of owners turbocharging the 2.4 L KA engine, with great success.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_240SX

User avatar
Ni2s4s0aSnX
Posts: 667
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 8:39 am
Car: Nissan 240sx 2.4L 12Valve

Post

89 has KA24E and the 91 has the KA24DE.

nab911
Posts: 2438
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 9:33 am
Car: 93 Nissan 240SX SE

Post

Redundancy... what a waste...

User avatar
Ni2s4s0aSnX
Posts: 667
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 8:39 am
Car: Nissan 240sx 2.4L 12Valve

Post

Just keepin it simple.

User avatar
dickie
Posts: 16559
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 7:55 am
Car: Killer Turtle

Post

lol i like the first reply... the blind leading the blind.

574-240sx
Posts: 9432
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 6:27 pm
Car: Nissans, Toyotas, Subaru

Post

d!ck wrote:lol i like the first reply... the blind leading the blind.
how about this one, I thought all 240s were the same.

User avatar
Nismochick240
Posts: 2020
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 9:00 am
Car: 95 240sx- BONE STOCK.. for now
Contact:

Post

lol... i'm not gonna reply what the differences are b/c Bos put it plan N simple... so here's what i am gonna say-> if you have the choice b/t the 89 or 91 go w/ the 91! more hp/better lookin body/.... ect... i would go w/ the 91 (thats what i have hehe-> 91 fastback)


Return to “240sx General Discussion”