Wow! Those are rated 84 -88 load rating capacity. Better suited to a S13 than a 2 ton FGY33 which requires an OEM minimum load rating of 94. Are the wheels super skinny also?the_sauce wrote:Its a 97 Q45. Has 19s running 225/35 tires.
Its either an inner or outer tie rod or the steering rack. Most likely a tie rod since they wear out regularly. If you've got the money, replace all 4 tie rods otherwise find a helper to turn the wheel while you watch the linkage.the_sauce wrote:Its a 97 Q45. Has 19s running 225/35 tires. Front toe rods are JIC S14 rods and are fine. Doesnt feel like a wheel bearing have had those go bad before. Only thing I can think is a steering tie rod because the other side is perfect. When bushings go out you feel it on both front wheels.
the_sauce wrote:Tire is on a 19x9.
Well I see that at best you are up to a 91 load rating, still significantly under the OEM minimum specified load rating.the_sauce wrote:Well I fixed everything today. Replaced the tierod ends both of them replaced both fornt bubbled tires with 235/35/19s. Adjusted the camber in a couple more degrees and lowered the car another inch.
Drives better than it ever has! And lays frame.
You miss the point entirely. It was an ten year old car with who knows what wear and tear on it besides worn out rubber components in the suspension. You have little idea how the suspension performed new with OEM specified tires. I bet then the braking, cornering and acceleration were much better than now.the_sauce wrote:The car was completely OEM for the first 4 months I owned it.