Its possible but you would have to provide enough air/fuel and the correct fuel that will withstand those high cylinder pressures. Also the ignition system has to be able to handle the different setup aswell. Would the factory ecu be capable of this w/ the right tune? Just curious.Liquid_Neon wrote:
PS- who would wanna shoot me if i put my DE pistons in my DET? With new rings of course... since my DE has 173,000miles(280,000K)
You've popped your top, so why stop! I would personally get the head done and even do the rings and the bearings. It's is much wiser to do the necessary maintenance now, then realize later that you should've done something else. Gives you a chance to look at your piston side walls and ringlands as well. This is the time not to be lazy, so just a hint of advice, so the things I recommend will give you peace of mind.Liquid_Neon wrote:most everything looks fine actuly, the walls are great looking. pistons look ok too.
Useing OEM style headgasket.Nissan can get them to me in about a week... not as bad as i kinda exaggerated about. The thing doesnt really look like she needs a rebuild.. ran strong until i hit the puddle.. and thoguht i blew the HG.
another question: do the DE and DET share the same time belt marks?
The DET's pistons are flat and the DE's piston's are considered domed which means the pistons' surface between the valve reliefs are raised higher than the valve reliefs and the surface on the outside of the valve reliefs.Liquid_Neon wrote:thx all, im gonna order the rings come tuesday. Ill inspect the bearings, but i dont doubt they are good.Has anyone seen DE and DET piston side by side? what makes the DE have 10:1 over the DET 8.5:1? The are rods are the same length, right? As in they might be swapable... that is if the DET ones are beefier. Im sure im gonna check anyway, but just asking in advance.If my parts come in a timley manor, i may get her up and running soon, yay!
If you have the JDM RWD DE's rods, they are the same as the DET rods. Can't confirm about the JDM FWD rods because I've never had one in my posession. But the USDM's rods are much thinner than the DET rods.Liquid_Neon wrote:THx dee, i figured that was about the only differance between them. Are the rods from DETs tougher too? or are they the same? I will see for myself in a few days when i open up my DE, but just thought id ask ahead of time.
If you're using the USDM's pistons, then the answer is "Yes" in the fact that the pistons are 10:1 compression. The JDM CA18DE boasts 9.5:1 compression which I guess makes them a wee bit different.float_6969 wrote:Is the compression on the CA18DE really 10:1? I was always under the impression it was 9.5:1. If it is I've got way higher compression pistons in my motor than I thought I did...
Wasn't me! Or I just don't remember.................float_6969 wrote:Did I have you send me a single piston, or was it Sean?
I'm one of the tri-stone users and unless you have experience with using the stones, stay away from them. the stones are very good for taking-out small imperfections, but you had better be constantly checking your ring gaps to make sure you don't bore the engine out of spec for whatever piston diameter you're using.Chris859 wrote:True on the honing, you need to "de-glaze" the cylinders to allow the new rings to properly seat. I have yet to build a ca18, but I have done a few domestic engines, as well as a couple sr20's. IMO a ball-hone gets the job of de-glazing done the best without actually enlarging the bore. With a normal stone type hone, you will notice all of the low spots in the cylinder walls - and in turn have to remove more material to clean up the bore. Just my .02
well you know I'm in the UK so take a guess.float_6969 wrote:12 pounds of what?
I'm a looser....