Post by
Q45tech »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/q45tech-u112.html
Wed Aug 07, 2002 12:40 am
"Among non-luxury brands falling below the average of 41.8 percent residual value were: Buick, Chevrolet, Chrysler, Daewoo, Dodge, Ford, Hyundai, Isuzu, Kia, Mazda, Mercury, Mitsubishi, Oldsmobile, Pontiac, Saturn and Suzuki.
Automotive Lease Group did not give the specific rank of below-average brands. Sundaram said the lowest percentage for a non-luxury brand, which he did not identify, was 29.5 percent.
Among luxury brands, Mercedes-Benz vehicles were best, with an expectation they will retain 54.5 percent of their original value after three years. Its CLK was top-rated in the luxury segment.
Luxury brands falling below the average of about 49 percent were: Cadillac, Infiniti, Jaguar, Lincoln, Saab and Volvo.""When a new vehicle costs less, its value erodes at a quicker rate.".......................................
So on average 3 year across the board LUX depreciation runs 54% to 45.5% of MSRP, just like the real estate business you want the least expensive house suitable in the Best neighborhood.Even if the Q loses 52% of its value in 3 years [36-40,000 miles] and an LS430 loses 47%, it can't overcome the fact that the LS costs more to own/lease/drive over the period due to the almost $5,500 out the door cost for equally equipt units.
Unless you put at least 20% down the scarey thing is you almost always owe more than either car is worth at 3 years.
Getting [private party sale] 25% of MSRP [$13,000] for a 6 year old [1996 Q model] [72,000 mile] is a challenge vs $17,500 for an equal LS400. But the LS cost you $60 more per month to drive so total ownership costs are a wash.
Certain 6 cylinder MB [E320] can be an relative [compared to others in the same class] economic deal if you are careful - don't have an accident [diminished value].