If I lived where you do I would probably do this on your 'G' and certainly on mine.harp00n wrote:I live in Ukraine, and we have a lot of "bad surprises" on the roads here that could damage the engine (rocks, junk...).
So I decided to install the defence for the crankcase (made of steel by our local ukrainian shop). The only issue, that bothers me - is the weigth of it - 10-12kg (22-26lb). On the other side, I beleive the defence will make some "underbrace strengthening" effect.
The only pictures I've got is for M35x, but I guess it'll help:
"BEFORE" ---------> "AFTER"
P.S. The alternative is the defence made of fibreglass, the weight is about 5 kg (11lb), though it won't help hitting huge rock and no "strengthening" effect.
One question. It is a little hard to see on this picture, but does this affect air flow to the radiator in anyway? I seem to remember somewhere that airflow to the back of the center grill (not through it) was critical for proper cooling?harp00n wrote:I live in Ukraine, and we have a lot of "bad surprises" on the roads here that could damage the engine (rocks, junk...).
So I decided to install the defence for the crankcase (made of steel by our local ukrainian shop). The only issue, that bothers me - is the weigth of it - 10-12kg (22-26lb). On the other side, I beleive the defence will make some "underbrace strengthening" effect.
Sounds like a well grounded idea.Sentientbydesign wrote:I've got something like this in EARLY development.
Mine will have a few goodies up it's sleeves AND will be made out of ABS or Aluminum.
Well the lower engine cover has no airflow properties as far as cooling, but the plastic is made to dissipate heat, so I think aluminum would be good because it deals with heat better than steel. The AWD model G has 7.5 inches of clearance before anything critical is endangered. Unlike Lambo's and ferraris which only have 4-5. And unless the one in the pic has 800lbs or more of torsional resistance, It wont provide any noticeable advantages in structural rigidity. It does however look great for beat up roads and things. I would like something like that going beneath half the car's underbody components in DC or Latin America...pfarmer wrote:
One question. It is a little hard to see on this picture, but does this affect air flow to the radiator in anyway? I seem to remember somewhere that airflow to the back of the center grill (not through it) was critical for proper cooling?
Perry
In the picture it appears that the area right up to the bottom edge of the bumper assembling ends up sealed. I was under the impression that this area is critical for proper airflow.Poyzinous wrote:
Well the lower engine cover has no airflow properties as far as cooling, but the plastic is made to dissipate heat, so I think aluminum would be good because it deals with heat better than steel. The AWD model G has 7.5 inches of clearance before anything critical is endangered. Unlike Lambo's and ferraris which only have 4-5. And unless the one in the pic has 800lbs or more of torsional resistance, It wont provide any noticeable advantages in structural rigidity. It does however look great for beat up roads and things. I would like something like that going beneath half the car's underbody components in DC or Latin America...
What is wrong with this picture?Nazc0 wrote:they dont fix the roads right because if they fix it bad then they come back in a while when its all messed up and fix it again badly thus creating jobs for themselfshere in america the roads are built in layers of sand concrete and such there its sand on dirt with a mix of asfalt that was made on a budget.the main roads are decent and some like the kiev-odessa highway are actualy better then most roads here(heres a pic of the speedo while i was driving on that route last year ) but if you turn off the main roads you better know how to a good slalom between the bumps
KM/H?pfarmer wrote:
What is wrong with this picture?
Perry
It's not a G? (although he never said it was).pfarmer wrote:
What is wrong with this picture?
Perry
I've been trying to figure out if there is or is not a problem just to the right.spacy9 wrote:
It's not a G? (although he never said it was).
192km/h = 120mph?
I give...
It is a little hard to tell since there are variations in Lacettys. Various versions have either a solid red needle for all instruments or on the smaller instruments a red tipped needle. None seem to have a red tick on the target instrument in question.Nazc0 wrote:wait what?im lost whats the problem?it was in a lacetti i was just showin the lack of speed limits, or more corectly the non enforcment of them the speed limit was 70 kph and there were bmw's tearing past me at 220-240kphi wish i was in my G but all the lacceti had was a tiny 1.8L engine with 120 hp but the car is not that heavy so it actualy was not that bad, but no comparion to a G
Ok Back to topic lolkmckis1029 wrote:wow... yeah it looks nice... and it looks like it would provide some extra bracing...
but yeah i was thinking the same thing... can the G get proper air flow with that on? can it release heat from the engine? Or if you do have a leak, that will delay you from noticing the leak as it pools on the skid plate before it drips down to ground... would pooling of A/C condensation be a problem?
IDK thats just my thoughts on saftey... it looks great though
Basically I am saying that it is very dangerous to drive at high speeds with low fuel (that is what is hard to tell in this case).Nazc0 wrote:hmm i dont know much about lacettys all i know that the one i drove was the newer chevrolet ones not the daewu(no idea how to spell that right)