Post by
Jesda »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/jesda-u7038.html
Sun Oct 26, 2003 1:22 am
Darn Cost Cutters
So according to the Morgan Friedman inflation calculator, my $43000 Q45 back in late 1991 would be $56845 in 2002.
Now, a brand new Q is $52k, with MUCH more equipment and features, would be $39334 in 1991 dollars.
To sell a $43000 car for just $39000 with bigger wheels, better tires, more power, more room, DVD navigation, VDC, fancy electronics galore, reclining rear seats, heated seats, and better acceleration, it seems the difference had to be accounted for somewhere else. This is what bothers me about new cars these days.
My mom drives an Acura MDX. Stepdad drives a Lexus LX470. I drive a 92 Q45 and a 93 Mazda MPV RWD V6. In my mom's MDX, a sub-40k SUV, the creases and crevices are uneven, like the plastic was cut and molded in a sloppy way. All of the buttons dont push in at the same depth, door handles feel loosely attached, wood trim looks Chrysler-fake, and panel gaps and unevenness are obvious. The leather seats look like they were yanked from a 93 Accord SE. The Lexus has none of these issues, but thats another $25k.
My old Q45 arguably has the most durable and detailed interior of all the vehicles at our house, and without question the best paint. After 11 years, its stunning to look at.
The old MPV isn't bad either, with nicely textured soft surfaces, closely assembled panels, and no irregularities of any sort. By no means is it upscale, but its orderly and durable.
Take a look at the 350Z. The plastic feels hollow and cheap.
If manufacturers are cutting costs on interiors, where will they go next? Cheap tires? Cheap suspension? Cheap paint and bodywork? Maybe these companies think that if we're distracted by cool gadgetry, we'll miss the obvious.
Auto sales are so price-driven that I wonder if I'll find myself saying "They don't build them like they used to" a few years down the road when I'm perusing the used market again.
-Jesda