So a blown n/a KA > running SR turbo?D Money wrote:lol, i think not! maybe rb one day, but i wouldnt go through the hassle of trading a superior motor for an inferior one.
I second that... N/A KA has more torque then a boosted SR...what a sad world we live inNismo_Freak wrote:So a blown n/a KA > running SR turbo?
boosted sr has more torque than na ka....your making us look bad. lolCheckered-Member wrote:I second that... N/A KA has more torque then a boosted SR...what a sad world we live in
i bet all the KA needs is a new head gasket
SR guys don’t post their torque numbers…gee I wonder whyD Money wrote: boosted sr has more torque than na ka....your making us look bad. lol
Hahhaha... might wanna venture into the SR forum sometime.Mustangs_Suck wrote:The KA forums also seems to have alot more problems and blown motors though.
I was just joking anyways.D Money wrote:2.4l>2l potential>jdm tizzite if i wanted a nice small 4 cylinder it would be a ca18. thanks 4 the input though nismofreak
Bwhahahahhahahhaha...Checkered-Member wrote:I second that... N/A KA has more torque then a boosted SR...what a sad world we live in
i bet all the KA needs is a new head gasket
Sounds like you also never learned to readCheckered-Member wrote:SR guys don’t post their torque numbers…gee I wonder why
OMGz0rs!Checkered-Member wrote:4179 topics on the N/A KA forum 114 of those “torque” is mentioned that is 2.73%
2896 topics on the SR forum 56 of those “torque” is mentioned 1.93%
So as you can see N/A KA coughforumcough has more torque then SR
You take everything WAY to seriously.Nismo_Freak wrote:Bwhahahahhahahhaha...
Just incase anyone else failed 3rd grade, 203 lb. ft. is GREATER than 160 lb. ft. mmmkay?
Sounds like you also never learned to read
OMGz0rs!
I think you are now ranked 2nd on my 10 most ignorant people on NICO. Congrats.