damn my ka blew! before it was even boosted

Your premier source for information on the Turbo KA: KA24E-T and KA24DE-T (KA with aftermarket turbo kit)!
User avatar
D Money
Posts: 1000
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 5:45 pm
Car: driving illegaly

Post

someone near chicago need to sell me theeres soon! the thermostat was stuck shut, and the bastard temp gauge said everything was great!! i need a de or would even take a kae as long as it ran


User avatar
Craving4Boost
Posts: 1495
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 10:44 am
Car: 91 240sx fastback

Post

wtf that suuuuckkksss.......your engine blew but it had nothing to do with boost

Florida240sx
Posts: 11114
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 7:17 am
Car: 1993 Nissan 240SX Hatch 5spd
2012 Nissan Altima S coupe 2.5
Location: DeLand FL

Post

sorry for your bad luck

Nismo_Freak
Posts: 10314
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 10:42 pm
Car: 89 Nissan 240SX

Post

Time for an SR

User avatar
D Money
Posts: 1000
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 5:45 pm
Car: driving illegaly

Post

lol, i think not! maybe rb one day, but i wouldnt go through the hassle of trading a superior motor for an inferior one.

Nismo_Freak
Posts: 10314
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 10:42 pm
Car: 89 Nissan 240SX

Post

D Money wrote:lol, i think not! maybe rb one day, but i wouldnt go through the hassle of trading a superior motor for an inferior one.
So a blown n/a KA > running SR turbo?

Must not have kicked that crack habit yet eh?

User avatar
Checkered-Member
Posts: 1593
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2003 7:14 am
Car: 1998 Nissan Altima (modded)
2003 Audi A6 2.7T (stock)
Contact:

Post

Nismo_Freak wrote:So a blown n/a KA > running SR turbo?
I second that... N/A KA has more torque then a boosted SR...what a sad world we live in

i bet all the KA needs is a new head gasket

User avatar
D Money
Posts: 1000
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 5:45 pm
Car: driving illegaly

Post

2.4l>2l potential>jdm tizzite if i wanted a nice small 4 cylinder it would be a ca18. thanks 4 the input though nismofreak

User avatar
D Money
Posts: 1000
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 5:45 pm
Car: driving illegaly

Post

Checkered-Member wrote:I second that... N/A KA has more torque then a boosted SR...what a sad world we live in

i bet all the KA needs is a new head gasket
boosted sr has more torque than na ka....your making us look bad. lol

User avatar
Checkered-Member
Posts: 1593
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2003 7:14 am
Car: 1998 Nissan Altima (modded)
2003 Audi A6 2.7T (stock)
Contact:

Post

D Money wrote: boosted sr has more torque than na ka....your making us look bad. lol
SR guys don’t post their torque numbers…gee I wonder why

4179 topics on the N/A KA forum 114 of those “torque” is mentioned that is 2.73%

2896 topics on the SR forum 56 of those “torque” is mentioned 1.93%

So as you can see N/A KA coughforumcough has more torque then SR

Mustangs_Suck
Posts: 684
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2002 12:38 pm

Post

The KA forums also seems to have alot more problems and blown motors though.

I'd rather have a reliable set up with less torque, than an engine that'll have more torque and be more fun but explode in a few thousand miles.

...I don't know how I feel about building up my KA after Fiznat's recent event.

Nismo_Freak
Posts: 10314
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 10:42 pm
Car: 89 Nissan 240SX

Post

Mustangs_Suck wrote:The KA forums also seems to have alot more problems and blown motors though.
Hahhaha... might wanna venture into the SR forum sometime.

SR's have plenty of problems as well.

Nismo_Freak
Posts: 10314
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 10:42 pm
Car: 89 Nissan 240SX

Post

D Money wrote:2.4l>2l potential>jdm tizzite if i wanted a nice small 4 cylinder it would be a ca18. thanks 4 the input though nismofreak
I was just joking anyways.

Do whatever suits you best.

Nismo_Freak
Posts: 10314
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 10:42 pm
Car: 89 Nissan 240SX

Post

Checkered-Member wrote:I second that... N/A KA has more torque then a boosted SR...what a sad world we live in

i bet all the KA needs is a new head gasket
Bwhahahahhahahhaha...

Just incase anyone else failed 3rd grade, 203 lb. ft. is GREATER than 160 lb. ft. mmmkay?
Checkered-Member wrote:SR guys don’t post their torque numbers…gee I wonder why
Sounds like you also never learned to read
Checkered-Member wrote:4179 topics on the N/A KA forum 114 of those “torque” is mentioned that is 2.73%

2896 topics on the SR forum 56 of those “torque” is mentioned 1.93%

So as you can see N/A KA coughforumcough has more torque then SR
OMGz0rs!

I think you are now ranked 2nd on my 10 most ignorant people on NICO. Congrats.

User avatar
Checkered-Member
Posts: 1593
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2003 7:14 am
Car: 1998 Nissan Altima (modded)
2003 Audi A6 2.7T (stock)
Contact:

Post

Nismo_Freak wrote:Bwhahahahhahahhaha...

Just incase anyone else failed 3rd grade, 203 lb. ft. is GREATER than 160 lb. ft. mmmkay?

Sounds like you also never learned to read

OMGz0rs!

I think you are now ranked 2nd on my 10 most ignorant people on NICO. Congrats.
You take everything WAY to seriously.

I make fun of SR’s because my friend that lives up the street from me, has a 240 coupe he paid 7 grand for an SR, yet I beat him 0-60 every single time with my heavy *** Altima

Mock me all you want, I’m just talking smack because this isn’t a serious “tech” thread.

Ignorant, no, talking allot of s***…yes

User avatar
fiznat
Posts: 5651
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 10:15 am
Car: Grown up :(
Contact:

Post

Give it a rest guys, comeon!

User avatar
D Money
Posts: 1000
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 5:45 pm
Car: driving illegaly

Post

sorry to hear about your car.... almost makes me want a jdm tizzite motor. what are your plans


Return to “KA24ET / KA24DET Forum”