My Rogue also makes the characteristic whine during deceleration at these speeds. And yes, it is a bit more noticeable than when new. A few other owners of Rogue's and other Nissan CVT equipped vehicles have commented about the whine. It appears to be characteristic of the transmission and is not indicative of a problem.Alyssads921 wrote:The noise happens EVERY time you decelerate (between 30 to 20 MPH). It is not super loud but you can hear it.

Why? Are you only interested in the fail rate of Nissan CVT's or other brands as well? I should think the better question to ask is which has a higher fail rate, CVT or regular transmission?chadhargis wrote:Nissan has been putting CVT transmissions in their vehicles since the early 90's. While I'm sure a number of them have failed, I'd be very interested in hearing the PERCENTAGE of them that have failed.
you cant compare the two. trucks that pull 60,000lbs need the gears to be able to withstand the torque loads. a rogue or any other sedan or SUV doesnt pull that amount and doesnt really need that TQ capabilities. that being said the Jatco CVT7 being placed into the Juke does have a few helical gears in the new-structured auxiliary transmission system, the next-generation CVT increases the gear ratio range, and friction-reduction. Which to me is great news. The gear ratio for the 1st gen rogue CVT's sucks. On the highways my RPM's are way to high when its in the final gear ratio available. Id love to have a lower gear ratio that would allow the engine to sit at 1500rpm while doing 65mph.chadhargis wrote:I have no figures, but I can assume by using my knowledge of each kind of transmission that the CVT would be less durable, but more efficient.
Until I see tractor trailers sporting CVT's pulling 60,000lb loads, I'll conclude that gears are the better solution, but not the most efficient one.



everything is a wear item, including the clutch packs.Dave1320 wrote:Doesnt matter the technology put into CVT's. They're belts and belts will stretch and lose it's tightness over time. You can feel a difference when driving a Rogue with 10 miles, compared to a Rogue with 60,000 miles. They drive like the torque converter is slipping at a high rate. The Nissan trucks, Pathfinder Xterra Armada Etc... still don't use CVTs because it can't handle the stress from the motor.
Transmission shops have an easy time replacing the CVT belts because all you need to do is pull out the assembly, use a special tool to separate the cones, and replace with a new belt.
planetary gears or not, when the valve body goes - no planetary gears in the world will save hard shifting, and failures to fully engage. when standard automatic transmission's go - slipping, hard shifting(enough to buck), holding gears longer, failure to shift, skipping gears are all symptoms. but thats a convo for a different threadDave1320 wrote:clutch packs and bands need adjustment over time, but it is the CVTs specifically don't last long. When they get really bad they start bucking and jerking and indicate they're about to go.
Non-CVT transmissions can still drive fine with wear and tear because they have multiple planetary gears and don't break like the belts and pulleys.