Post by
ultrapulse »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/ultrapulse-u44961.html
Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:52 pm
Any comments welcome.Firstly the VG30DE(TT) i have in the shed. also have a tintop z32 tt manual so know plenty about these engines. I do know they got more torque out of this design, more for the NA by memory than a shorter inlet. Though in the same article it said that the R32 GTR had no tuned runner length, yet they still go pretty good (but are a bit revvy).
1.I think the separate plenums are just like that to get the runner length long. This was definitely the z32 design anyway. I dont believe there is any "secret" reason. I went against this design because of simplicity and space, especially when forced induction is involved and the lack of possible performance gained in doubling the length of things. Working on the z32 totally sucks!! Mainly because of its inlet manifold!
2.A guy at the local engine place has made a plastic mani. Is pretty ugly. However I believe that because newer plastics allow more heat and strength, along with an ever-increasing skyrocketing price of ali especially cast. One small possible benefit would be less heat-soak due to conduction from the heads, one thing I am looking into with coating mine. I know u cant touch the inlet on my z32 once youve been out for a hard drive. Cant do the intake charge any favours.
I admire your curiosity. My mani is quite light, approx 1/3 the weight of the z32 v6 one, and makes everything visible and accessible. I thought about the design for ages before I started, but just cant remember the reasons for everything. I believe unless there is a huge potential, dont go complex. Kinda like the KISS the americans talk about. Also take note that cars are not only performance items, like most businesses, they will be run by accountants as well (just like my work) so some things are done for that reason. Too much typing but I may have already said that I would normally trade a small amount of power for a tidy, simple, cheaper, less complicated design.