crower v2 before and after :(

Your premier source for information on the Turbo KA: KA24E-T and KA24DE-T (KA with aftermarket turbo kit)!
SeanC
Posts: 367
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 2:35 pm
Car: 1993 240sx SE

Post

i will let the graph do the talking:



User avatar
babowc
Posts: 3108
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 3:26 pm
Car: 240sx
Contact:

Post

1.8hp decrease /3.7tq increase?.......

SeanC
Posts: 367
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 2:35 pm
Car: 1993 240sx SE

Post

ummm yeah... WTF!!! i just sent and email to BC. we shall see what he says.

boiracersxt
Posts: 58
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 12:02 am
Car: 240sx

Post

I put in Crower 2 stage cams and I can feel a huge differance in top end. That doesn't make sense how you ended up losing some power.

User avatar
sunnys14
Posts: 1600
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 8:59 pm
Car: S14

Post

is this direct drop in with no tuning?

nissanfanatic
Posts: 1314
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 8:41 pm
Car: 1992 Nissan 240sx SE
Contact:

Post

Then what is all this "extra" power up top you were feeling?

zerothread/238927

Quote »is this direct drop in with no tuning?[/quote]MAFS systems show gains without tuning.

KATwo40
Posts: 1761
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 9:40 am
Car: 1993 240sx KA-T

Post

And how much did thes premium cams cost you?


User avatar
Edub1
Posts: 1931
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 2:20 pm
Car: 89 240sx KA-T

Post

The margin of error on a Dynojet is larger than the difference between the two runs. A few more runs would be good. But anyway, yah that's some BS.

User avatar
babowc
Posts: 3108
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 3:26 pm
Car: 240sx
Contact:

Post

maybe there were differences in the environment?thats a 14day gap.. so i dunno.different ambient temp, etc?etc?

User avatar
Riubens
Posts: 364
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 1:38 pm
Car: ka-t 240 and 99 Q45 t

Post

guess I wont blow my money on those cams.

SeanC
Posts: 367
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 2:35 pm
Car: 1993 240sx SE

Post

yes direct drop in. and i do not know, my car definitely felt stronger...


Return to “KA24ET / KA24DET Forum”