SmoovC wrote:I agree; "one can make the case for anything." In this instance, it is a cell phone being stolen, and possible access to your car; not unlike your keys being stolen, right?! I do not endorse the product, and in my personal situation I find no use for it, and it sounds like you do not either. That being said, does not however, "make the product useless."
The advantage to the unit is that it offers hands-free operation to unlock your car. Many Ford owners enjoy an active lift gate that operates in pretty much the same fashion: hands-free. So much so in fact, that it is a major selling point for them.
Conceptually, passive locking/unlocking is a great feature that I am sure many people would desire. But, just like all new technology, implementation will take on many forms until consumers drive the market in a certain direction. Case and point would be the OP looking for a credit card style passive system.
Agreed on several points. For my needs, it's useless. After all, my hand needs to open the door for me to get in the car anyway right? We have a little button that unlocks the doors with the presence of a key fob. The lift gate example you are talking about is slightly different because there are times where your hands are full and you need to load your vehicle. Also notice that I believe that is only offered in the Ford SUVs and not their sedans. The thought being that if you're going to get a lot of s*** and you own both an SUV and a sedan, chances are you're going to take your SUV to pick up said s***.
So, for me, a waste of (lots of) money for a feature that the M's don't need. For my BMW e91 that requires the use of the keyfob unlock button...possibly if I really desired that feature but not for the price.