Yes, in 84 and 85 they had a GSLSE model that came with the 13B motor. It also came with 4 wheel disks.nizmo_dryfta wrote:Okay ive done some research but ive been pretty lazy figured id put the question out here too. is it possible to put the TT rotary from the 93+ rx-7 into the 1st gen rx-7? alot of ppl seem to put v8s in the older ones tho eh another one of my weird swap questions.
Yeah there is a definate increase in power. You are going from a single turbo to a sequential twin. I believe the FC turbo was like 215-220 and the FD was like 255-270. I could be way off but I looked at an FD about 8 years ago while I was still stationed in San Diego and still had my hatch (before I knew anything about the S chassis. The price wasn't that bad then either. I was looking at a 96 I think in 98 and it was only like $15k. Had an *** load of miles on it though. Took it for a drive and man was that thing nice.nizmo_dryfta wrote:dont own a 7..i just get bored and think up stuff lol. no but i actually meant the 2nd gen chassis....good point about the gas. is there any mojor power differences between the two?
Tuning forks FTW.charlieo wrote:Thoughts of SHO swaps dance in my head sometimes.
it looks like her back is hurting lololadrians_s13 wrote:dam one_love, out of all your sigs... this one i just cant stop staring at.lol..
Neal FYI the FC turbo II was only making 200hp by the 90-92 and less before that I believe 170, also the FD chassis was only making 255hp and they only sold 93-95 FD3S' here in the States. Nothing past 95 due to a sales drop. Unless imported otherwise.C33LaurelRacer wrote:
Yeah there is a definate increase in power. You are going from a single turbo to a sequential twin. I believe the FC turbo was like 215-220 and the FD was like 255-270. I could be way off but I looked at an FD about 8 years ago while I was still stationed in San Diego and still had my hatch (before I knew anything about the S chassis. The price wasn't that bad then either. I was looking at a 96 I think in 98 and it was only like $15k. Had an *** load of miles on it though. Took it for a drive and man was that thing nice.
Thanks for clearing that up for me dude. Hell, that was 8 years ago when I looked at that FD...I couldn't remember what year it was.NSR_S13 wrote: Neal FYI the FC turbo II was only making 200hp by the 90-92 and less before that I believe 170, also the FD chassis was only making 255hp and they only sold 93-95 FD3S' here in the States. Nothing past 95 due to a sales drop. Unless imported otherwise.
with racing beat race header and straight pipes...do itcharlieo wrote:I'll never bother turbocharging my RX-7. This one will say n/a, maybe eventually with a mean PP. Which will render it mostly unstreetable, but wicked powerful.
Once I stop my ears from bleeding...nismofly wrote:with racing beat race header and straight pipes...do it
then post vids
pretty sure that aint street legal lolNSR_S13 wrote: 787B anyone......4 rotor
Click here to see VideoMinisterofDOOM wrote:Holy crap...I bet that thing sounded insane.
So... how often did that car have to stop and refuel the oil tank?charlieo wrote: It was said that when they took the 26B apart, it looked like it could have lasted another race.
JimmyMethod wrote:
So... how often did that car have to stop and refuel the oil tank?