Bubba1 wrote:
The Americans dominated the bottom again are continuing to close the gap. CU noted Chrysler showed significant improvement, specifically the 300, Durango, and Grand Cherokee. Ford is also building some nice vehicles, but their electronic interfaces/infotainment system, especially "mytouch" hurt them.
Yeah, I briefly read through the magazine. Most noticeable about Ford was transmission and reliability. The Nissan Leaf didn't make the list because it has a ridiculous 75 capacity with with a really slow charge time.
They seriously need to consider a changeable battery system. Like a hand held drill, use up the battery swap it with a charged one. This is also healthy on the battery, instead of randomly charging it to keep it charged.
This would help with Nissan's New York Taxi deal. Instead of offering two cars per taxi driver... why not one car and three batteries... Then the driver can just drive to a designated swap station, swap a battery by pushing the new battery in the car and out of the other side the old battery plops out. Taxi driver doesn't have to waste his time waiting for the thing to charge.
Then when it comes to retail, the car isn't hindered by an old battery. The electric car should be sold as in two separate markets the chassis and batteries. Sell them separate. The battery would have to be a standard cartage size that can fit all models old or new. This will allow an older chassis benefit from a newer battery tech.
Don't get me wrong. I am not wooing for the electric car. I am very petrol-head and will always prefer it. But it's just stupid how the manufacturers are coming out with these expensive electric cars they will only fail like it did in the 90's.