SupraStar wrote:I expected M45 bias here, but I hadn't expected GS bashing..LOL
Well ... not all the folks are bashing GS's, and the bias here is natural. I am sure it would be the other way on a Lexus site!
The GS430 is a fine car too ... just a different target buyer, IMHO.
SupraStar wrote:I suspect most people here have never driven the GS. My GS ran 13.8 in the 1/4 mile the 1st time I hit the track with it. That was with an exhaust and K&N..that's it. I don't know of too many grandpa grocery getters that run much quicker than that.
I have not driven the GS430, but have driven a GS400. Clearly, if you put a powerful V-8 into a lighter car (than the LS430), it will perform well. That is essentially the reason for the difference between the Infiniti Q45 and M45 too!
My problem with Lexus is that, in general, I find the them bland. No soul!
But there are exceptions: my wife, for example, likes the RX350 a lot (okay, it is not a sedan ) and I think it is one of the better looking SUV's around of that size, so we may get that for her.
SupraStar wrote:I have my doubts the M45 would be much quicker, if any, than the GS, and in most every magazine test I've read, the GS is quicker.
Now that I do not know about ... I have not looked recently. In all the older comparisons, the M45 did very well (recent C&D comparisons on the new models, in particular) compared to other price-comparable cars. Including the GS430, as I recall.
SupraStar wrote:The styling is rather unique with the M45...which I rather like.
One of the main reasons we got the car!
SupraStar wrote:The M45s I have driven (3 different ones) all seem to have considrably weaker brakes than the factory GS brakes. Are there upgrades available in this regard?
Getting a good technician to adjust brakes properly makes a difference. My 2003 M45 stops very well, but I have not compared it to a GS430, so I cannot comment on that.
SupraStar wrote:The turning radius in the M45 felt huge. Maybe it was just me?
Hmmm ... I can say that it is as good as my wife's current Acura 2.2 CL (which is a much smaller car, but FWD) so I am satisfied with the M45 turning radius. Admittedly, this is not a measure that I worry about though ...
SupraStar wrote:Both cars are nice, and I won't go wrong with either.
Now that is something I would agree with ... and said so in my first post too!
SupraStar wrote:There is no need for an extended warranty with the GS..but it sounds like everyone here recommends one for the M45. To me, that sounds like the M5 might be a touch less reliable..likely due to the complexity of the M45 gizmos.
Perhaps, but the day you do have an electronic problem with the GS430 (and they are not immune to it, no matter how reliable the Lexus is), you may regret the lack of an extended warranty. All modern car electronics are expensive to repair/replace - no matter which manufacturer you are talking about!
SupraStar wrote:Who here is very high mileage M45s? I'd really like to hear from them...
I do not know if this qualifies as high mileage, but I have about 47k miles on my 2003 M45. No major problems - just very minor typical things - and my oil consumption is really low (about 1/4 to 1/2 quart, occasionally a tad higher, every 3750 miles).
So far, the only irritating thing I have had go wrong (other than being hit from the rear once) are the trunk struts, and they were replaced under warranty, and the trunk opening function is working perfectly now.
Z