confused about compressor maps

Information on the naturally-aspirated KA24E and KA24DE engines.
cow
Posts: 201
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2003 6:13 pm
Car: beep beep

Post

Ok.. I was looking at compressor maps for a couple of turbos and I am kinda confused. I calculated the flow of a KA to be about 19 lbs/min (does this sound right?). Then I figured at .8 bar it would be like 30 something, I don't have the numbers in front of me. Anyway, when looking at the compressor map, do I use the 30 lb number to match with the pressure ratio? I think that's right but i'm not sure. If this makes no sense I'll try to clarify later. :\

Thanks in advance.


lessthanjakejohn
Posts: 4105
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 6:39 am

Post

Yes, you use the x=30 y=pressureratio.

Go over 30, Up pressure ratio.

User avatar
huguetpj
Posts: 996
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 7:54 am
Car: 93 KAT Coupe

Post


cow
Posts: 201
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2003 6:13 pm
Car: beep beep

Post

Yeah, I have read maximum boost and I was using the methods described in it. I just noticed that using boosted and unboosted numbers produced 2 results that both were very efficient, but for different turbos. Anyway thanks to all..

cow
Posts: 201
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2003 6:13 pm
Car: beep beep

Post

By the way that is a great website, thanks huguetpj :D

User avatar
huguetpj
Posts: 996
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 7:54 am
Car: 93 KAT Coupe

Post

No prob... thanks for the compliment:pface

User avatar
C-Kwik
Moderator
Posts: 8070
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2002 9:28 pm
Car: 2013 Chevy Volt, 1991 Honda CRX DX

Post

Pedro, You look to be on the right track on your site except for one thing. It looked like you plugged in 85% VE in all your figures. Motors tend to have a VE curve that varies with RPM. Variable cam set-ups tend to have flatter VE curves. But since a KA's torque drops off so dramatically after 6000 RPM, your CFM calculations may be on the high side at 7000 RPM. I didnt see any notes regarding cam changes or headwork, so I assume a stock KA's characteristics. Just something you might want to consider. My rather conservative estimates for 1 bar of boost puts airflow just above 30 lbs/min last time I did the calculation.

User avatar
huguetpj
Posts: 996
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 7:54 am
Car: 93 KAT Coupe

Post

C-kwik... thanks for the inputs, and yep the head was stock when I did the calculations and purchased the turbo. Since I'm rebuilding it now I'm gonna do a mild port and polsih.

But since VE cannot be calculated theoretically, I used an estimated value all through the RPM range. Hope this doesn't affect my selection much... :pface

User avatar
C-Kwik
Moderator
Posts: 8070
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2002 9:28 pm
Car: 2013 Chevy Volt, 1991 Honda CRX DX

Post

Well, while it can't be calculated, you can make an educated guess. Figuring that most DOHC motors make anywhere from 85-90% VE, use a number in this range at the torque peak. Then kind of work backwards and calculate what torque would be at that that RPM with 100% VE. Using this as your base torque I'd use a dyno chart to determine torque levels at the RPM points you want to plot. Then calculate the percentage of difference between the base torque figure you came up with, and the torque on the dyno at that RPM. That percentage should be somewhere along the lines of the engine's VE. There are certainly other factors, and this is by no means totally accurate, but would be a better reflection of VE than using some arbitrary number all the way across the board.

User avatar
huguetpj
Posts: 996
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 7:54 am
Car: 93 KAT Coupe

Post

good info. I'm gonna make a note of that one... thanks


Return to “KA24E / KA24DE Forum”