Well, it's nice to know I'm not the only one. Anyway, I investigated this a little on my own ... here's how I see it:
The OEM shifter has several noise reduction aids designed into it. One being a rubber (or equiv. compound) filled shifter rod housing. The second being the plastic retainer ring at the ball of the assembly. The third and most obvious is materials.
B&M's shifter rod is solid aluminum throughout. The retainer design at the ball joint is completely different from the OEM unit as it incorporates two spring assemblies encased in their own housings, compared to the OEM O-ring unit. These factors alone contribute to the megaphone affect of carrying noise up from the transmission through the shifter, just by means of metal-on-metal.
The B&M like most every other aftermarket part is designed to maximize performance. In doing so, the designers must compensate on other factors such as noise, harshness and vibration.
I also believe that the way the 240's transmission is designed plays into this as well. You don't get these kinds of noises from most front wheelers that utilize cable driven shifter assemblies. And, like I said before, I had a Steeda short shifter in my 98 Cobra. Yes it made some noise, but the transmission was larger, the car was louder and the shifter design was different which when factored together made the transmission noise less intrusive.
I'm not happy with the B&M from a noise issue alone. The build is superb and the shifts are tight. But, I ended up putting the stock shifter back in. Maybe when the turbo, exhaust and tires get here I'll put it back in ...
Question; what are the design differences in Nismo's and Mr. C's? I've never seen either and was wondering about both.
Anyway, this is the world according to Scott ... feel free to add your own philosophy