The program has been in the works long before Obama became president. The original groups that were upset about the concept really were the classic car groups who are worried about their part supplies drying up.Tampa G35 Sedan 6MT wrote:I just saw a video of them doing to a older Jeep Cherokee... The thing looked like it was running good...
I freaking hate Obama... Whats next... Us... ?
I was talking about in this country.awdjdmtalon wrote:This progam was started in Califonia over 15 yrs ago.
This program has also been in place in germany for awhile now too. But there is a lot of coruption in europe w/ it.
Right cars at the right price should be what drives the market. The reason why none of these works is largely associated with the ability of the oil industry to manipulate the market place. At times large trucks to many may see like the right vehicle, raise the price of a therm and they no longer look that way. The same in reverse, a Prius can look like the right type and six months later become the opposite.biggie wrote:Z32s are on the list as well. Not a fan of this program.
So did 'employee prices' and so on, but these are all band-aids for the real problems associated with the car industry and of course other industries. Everyone seems to be into today not tomorrow and many don't invest what they should in themselves.leeG35 wrote:Program seems to be working well from where I sit. Neighbor traded in a Ford Exploder on a new Rav4 and brother-in-law unloaded a faded red 95 Thunderbird that a dealer said wasn't worth taking in trade three years ago on a 2010 Camry. My brother is miffed though, his old Volvo isn't considered a gas guzzler and doesn't qualify for the rebate.
"Classic" cars (over 25 years old) don't qualify so arn't under threat. As to your other favorites, if they are worth more than the rebate they're in no danger either.
Yes, Perry. I agree, but you use a band-aid to stop the bleeding so you can survive to make the long term changes. Eliminating clunkers from the highway and replacing them with higher mileage vehicles is a first, very small step. Let's see if the car companies and automotive consumer are up for the hard choices needed to achieve real progress in the long term. This is a time of amazing opportunity bold people with vision.pfarmer wrote:
So did 'employee prices' and so on, but these are all band-aids for the real problems associated with the car industry and of course other industries. Everyone seems to be into today not tomorrow and many don't invest what they should in themselves.
Perry
The objective is to get the clunker off the road permanently.kmckis1029 wrote:im comfused... why do they have to "kill the engine"????
I don't know why you would think a band-aid is going to stop the bleeding of a hemorrhaging artery.leeG35 wrote:
Yes, Perry. I agree, but you use a band-aid to stop the bleeding so you can survive to make the long term changes. Eliminating clunkers from the highway and replacing them with higher mileage vehicles is a first, very small step. Let's see if the car companies and automotive consumer are up for the hard choices needed to achieve real progress in the long term. This is a time of amazing opportunity bold people with vision.
It will get many people in debt for short term gains. The problem isn't the clunkers on the road, it is the new cars that have failed to get on the road. When people are already far in debt it doesn't do much good to have them trade good reliable transportation that is paid for in for something that is not.biggie wrote:To me what they are doing is probably getting people into debt when they may not need to be. Thought we had learned that lesson from the housing issue. Maybe not.
Also killing used parts/junkyards and local mechanics could be a bad biproduct.
Much less taking away beautiful cars like that Z31 for something that looks like a box on wheels, etc.
Only American car in the top 10 I think is the Focus. Rest are mostly Honda/Toyota. Which is funny and good, since Ford never took a bailout.Tampa G35 Sedan 6MT wrote:The problem i don't like is it creates waste. And the funny part is that most people... at least around here are buying Toyotas, an Hyundai lol
Isn't this for the Auto Companies that are government owned
DJ
I used to have a Honda Accord, made in Ohio. My wife had a Camry, made in Kentucky. Most of this rebate money is staying in the US.biggie wrote:Only American car in the top 10 I think is the Focus. Rest are mostly Honda/Toyota. Which is funny and good, since Ford never took a bailout.
But gee, who knew we wouldn't get that bailout money back because all of those companies are a big FAIL.
I believe this runs into problems with the World Trade Organization. We gave China a lot of s*** for it, they were giving their own country discounts on steel and other resources and adding a tax, or not a tax but more than would be paid domestically to foreign counties. I didn't see a problem with that, for it helps the government that owns the resources, but I remember hearing China got some heat for it. If we did what you're saying, it'd create the same problem.Tampa G35 Sedan 6MT wrote:Yes... But still they are Japan Owned... Not that their is anything wrong with it... and that is what I love about USA... But I don't think it should apply to "Non-American Auto Companies" It should be an incentive for purchasing a GM, Chrysler, or Ford IMHO...
Now that might not seem fair...
And I have to say that ford is making a fairly good product these days...
SHO, The Flex, The New f-150 is very nice too!
The funny thing about the 'waste' statement (which I agree with) is that is one of the selling points, recycle clunkers into new cars.Tampa G35 Sedan 6MT wrote:The problem i don't like is it creates waste. And the funny part is that most people... at least around here are buying Toyotas, an Hyundai lol
Isn't this for the Auto Companies that are government owned
DJ
The band aid will not help in the long run since it is a band aid without addressing the real issue.Supamon wrote:you guys are funny. We admit that this is a pressing issue that needs to be addressed. Yet have a problem with the government trying. If a band aid is not going to fix the severely wounded auto industry then certainly doing nothing will help either.
Nevertheless this is quite ironic coming from a bunch of guys driving foreign made sports cars.
BUT: Who's tax money was used to pay the American carmakers and save them. We want the money back, hence the 'say' in what's going on with this program.Supamon wrote:Nevertheless this is quite ironic coming from a bunch of guys driving foreign made sports cars.