http://www.sltrib.com/ci_14308399
In order to save money.
What he doesn't understand is the impact this will have everywhere else. There's already a problem with freshman-level classes in college, especially in state universities and other "cheaper" schools, which often feel just like high school. Freshly graduated high school students are often not mature enough to fit into that learning environment anyway, and their presence is often detrimental to the classroom experiences of older college students. This was my personal experience in many classes. Putting large numbers of 16 and 17 year old kids in college classes is a recipe for disaster.
I find the implication that graduation can simply be "accelerated" as though we can simply take more credits sooner to graduate early a sign of his naiivete. Yes, it's possible. But Utah's school system has demonstrated a distinct lack of the required organization to do this successfully. I have friends who graduated a semester or a year early. But I also know people (including myself) who, despite the "guidance" of school-system counselors, came up lacking required credits or needing to cram in prerequisite credits, because they had been missed or skipped due to oversight or lack of information on behalf of those school counselors. If you're counting on every single student graduating in 11 years, you've got to be on top of this stuff, from grade 6 on. It won't happen. So what will happen is kids will end up taking night classes to cram in 8+ missing credits. Or they'll end up taking the 12th year anyway. It'll be a mess.
It's a joke. I understand there's a budget issue. But the federal education system is already a joke. Cutting vast chunks out of it is not a solution to anything.
FWIW, neither Buttars nor his proposition are very popular with anyone I know around here. But then, he did get voted back into office, so SOMEONE likes him.