Check out these Fast times

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
240Knightrider
Posts: 3383
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 6:48 pm
Contact:

Post

These are grand ams. Sorry I had to share, hahaha

Big Dog Elite(the 13-second brotherhood): 99+ N-Body:1- SPAZ - 13.73 @ 102.70 MPH - timeslip 2- PACE - 13.86 @ 96.10 MPH -no slip3- botlfed - 13.92 @ 96.52 MPH -no slip

Top NA ET's:1) kubiache - 14.864 @ 92.61 MPH - timslip2) Sorry_Officer - 14.870 @ 92.01 MPH - timeslip3) 2002GT - 14.910 @ 93.08 MPH - timeslip4) Blackrider - 14.966 @ 90.31 MPH -timeslip5) Schweppe23 - 14.97 @ 91.10 MPH -no slip6) SC/T Girl - 15.01 @ 92.26 MPH -no slip7) Sexysteve - 15.02 @ 90.83 MPH -no slip8) 3400man - 15.039 @ 90.86 MPH - timeslip9) ViperGTSR_500hp - 15.086 @ 88.51 MPH timeslip10) SpyhunteR - 15.087 @ 93.91 MPHtimeslip11) coupe - 15.146 @ 90.20 MPH - timeslip12) 95-GT - 15.189 @ 89.47 MPH timeslip13) chill03sct - 15.205 @ 89.19 MPH - no slip14) H.O. Driver - 15.216 @ 88.54 MPH - timeslip15) Pucci - 15.263 @ 87.78 MPH - no slipHonorable Mention) MSJHWT - 15.283 @ 89.95 MPH - timeslip

Top Boosted ET's:1) IrateGT - 14.01 @ 96.85 MPH timeslip2) Rydog - 14.141 @ 101.40 MPH - timeslip (+ Nitrous)3) deek00 - 14.19 @ 97.19 MPH - timeslip4) Jaketuff - 14.34 @ 93.38 - no slip5) AaronGTR - 14.46 @ 94.14 MPH -no slip6) aleroboy - 14.618 @ 93.93 MPH - timeslip 7) Deek00 - 14.792 MPH @ 96.13 MPH - timeslip8) KmanGT1 - 14.82 @ 93.30 MPH -no slip9) AMRAAM4 - 14.93 @ 89.88 MPH -no slip10)Honorable Mention)


[Zero-S]
Posts: 5295
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2003 10:56 am
Car: Tell me whats wrong with this picture. 3 240's, only one runs.

Post

You're kidding, right?

UncleBen
Posts: 7178
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2002 7:06 am
Car: '05 Infiniti G35 Sedan Sport
'98 Nissan 240SX LE A/T
'95 Nissan 240SX SE A/T
Contact:

Post

What? Why?

silkk
Posts: 2357
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2004 5:49 pm
Car: 94 B13
89 S13
07 S2000

Post

Top NA ET's:1) kubiache - 14.864 @ 92.61 MPH - timslip

Top Boosted ET's:1) IrateGT - 14.01 @ 96.85 MPH timeslip

theres a .863 second difference between NA and boosted?

[Zero-S]
Posts: 5295
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2003 10:56 am
Car: Tell me whats wrong with this picture. 3 240's, only one runs.

Post

I'd expect more really.

User avatar
Mr1der
Posts: 36020
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:35 am
Car: It's still not a Nissan...
Location: Lebanon TN

Post

ahahahahhahaahahahh

wonder how many of them have GT-R stickers on them...

240Knightrider
Posts: 3383
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 6:48 pm
Contact:

Post

found that at GrandamGt.com or net or someting with that name. I laughed really hard at that one, makes me change my mind on ownind a grand am again.

User avatar
TachyonS14
Posts: 1432
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2003 11:11 pm

Post

No offense, but I'd rather have a civic than a grand am.

Justicc86
Posts: 76
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2002 6:26 pm
Car: anything to do with cars

Post

check out http://www.intense-racing.com they have a 98 gtp grand prix that runs 11.177 @ 123.05 mph

240Knightrider
Posts: 3383
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 6:48 pm
Contact:

Post

yeah those grand Prix are pretty mean. I would get one of those. for a front wheel drive car you can do little to go fast.

User avatar
Mr1der
Posts: 36020
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:35 am
Car: It's still not a Nissan...
Location: Lebanon TN

Post

I think that GTP has been converted to a turbo...

we have supercoupes that run about that.

[Zero-S]
Posts: 5295
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2003 10:56 am
Car: Tell me whats wrong with this picture. 3 240's, only one runs.

Post

That GTP took a ****load of work to get to the 11's...there were a few posts about that on orlandoforums.

User avatar
HondaCRX
Posts: 75
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 7:25 pm

Post

where's this forum's top NA and boosted ET list?

UncleBen
Posts: 7178
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2002 7:06 am
Car: '05 Infiniti G35 Sedan Sport
'98 Nissan 240SX LE A/T
'95 Nissan 240SX SE A/T
Contact:

Post

Whats it matter? Its alot faster than low 14's for a boosted 240. You and I both know that.

UncleBen
Posts: 7178
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2002 7:06 am
Car: '05 Infiniti G35 Sedan Sport
'98 Nissan 240SX LE A/T
'95 Nissan 240SX SE A/T
Contact:

Post

Well off the to of my head real fast, Aries NA powered 240 runs 11's or somewhere arond there, and top boosted 240 is who knows what, 11's, 10's, something in that area. So, there you go.

nlzmo400r
Posts: 4904
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 12:23 pm
Car: '02 Nissan Altima QR25DE
'93 Nissan 240SX hatch KA24DE

Post

every single one of those would smoke my car, congrats

240Knightrider
Posts: 3383
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 6:48 pm
Contact:

Post

I just thought it was funny there was a guy saying that there was a sunfire running low 13s saying he was running faster than anyone of the other people on the forum could dream of. Stupid people.

240Knightrider
Posts: 3383
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 6:48 pm
Contact:

Post

nlzmo400r wrote:every single one of those would smoke my car, congrats


Yeah but all you gotta do is spend a few hundred buy an intake and headers and then your beating the turbo guys.

It doesnt make any sense to me though, cause grand ams have a lot of lower end torque. But they V6 all have auto trannys from factory. and the 4 bangers have both auto and manual. But I guess the lower end torque messess them up at higher end.

StrangeLove
Posts: 2502
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 11:35 am
Car: 1995 Nissan 240sx

Post

I have a video of a 95 240 running 9.4 seconds in 1/4 miles. Don't know anything about the car though.

I got it off the multimedia forum

240Knightrider
Posts: 3383
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 6:48 pm
Contact:

Post

LINK?

UncleBen
Posts: 7178
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2002 7:06 am
Car: '05 Infiniti G35 Sedan Sport
'98 Nissan 240SX LE A/T
'95 Nissan 240SX SE A/T
Contact:

Post

and intake and header isn't going to make ANY 240 run low 14's, I dont care what anyone says. I mean spend a couple thousand and then you are beating them because you can be turbo'd or even some hardcore NA work, but no intake and header will make a 240 run low 14's

240Knightrider
Posts: 3383
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 6:48 pm
Contact:

Post

Um ok maybe if your runnin a cheap intake and cheap headers (means exhaust as well) , and you wheel hop of the line. yeah then I would agree with you.

Doogz
Posts: 667
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2003 5:58 am
Car: '89 240sx coupe

Post

Was i the only one that was expecting to see some old pics or quotes from "Fast Times at Ridgemont High"? Your topic tricked me!!!

User avatar
Megaseth
Posts: 3863
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2002 5:00 pm
Car: 2002 Pathfinder SE
Contact:

Post

no, hes right. you wont run faster than a mid 15 or so with just the basic bolt-ons....even with weight reduction.

240Knightrider
Posts: 3383
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 6:48 pm
Contact:

Post

ok, im guess if two say something one should believe them. My apologiesI just thought I read a thread of 240s running mid to low 15s stock. I guess I thought wrong.

User avatar
Megaseth
Posts: 3863
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2002 5:00 pm
Car: 2002 Pathfinder SE
Contact:

Post

stock? how? stock they run around a 16.4 or so. 14s are out of the question.

240Knightrider
Posts: 3383
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 6:48 pm
Contact:

Post

got them with this thread some were running low 15s stock. Of course they coulda been lying.

http://www.nissaninfiniticlub....times

User avatar
HondaCRX
Posts: 75
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 7:25 pm

Post

i still haven't seen a list of ETs of NICO cars...

lessthanjakejohn
Posts: 4105
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 6:39 am

Post

I don't think we've ever compiled one. Would be pretty cool though.

User avatar
Mr1der
Posts: 36020
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:35 am
Car: It's still not a Nissan...
Location: Lebanon TN

Post

Doogz wrote:Was i the only one that was expecting to see some old pics or quotes from "Fast Times at Ridgemont High"? Your topic tricked me!!!


I demand we cut straight to the pool scene!


Return to “General Chat”