Alfredo24.pr wrote:SBK03SE wrote:I run 87 80% of the time, and I've only had it for <10,000mi. No problems.
The few times I pay the extra 5-6$ for 91/93 I can't say I notice a real difference.
Side note: Today I got up to 332.8mi before the light came on. Usually comes on at 275mi. I kept it under 2500rpm 95% of the time, eeked out almost 60mi more. This was on 87, I'm gonna try 91 now.
Last time I had to fill with regular because there was no 91 or 93 nearby, my gas went down noticeably quicker than when I use 93 octane, but now I have to settle for 91 since about a month ago, I don't know why, my country just stopped bringing 93 to gas stations.
The gas stations around here mix in ethanol with the lower-grade gas. 89 has 5% ethanol, 87 has 10% ethanol. Ethanol isn't as efficient as normal gas, so this should contribute to some of the decreased fuel efficiency I notice. In terms of stored energy, ethanol is 34% less efficient, so a 10% mix should be 3.4% less efficient. It also likely affects how our engines run, which could also lower fuel economy.
The differences I've noticed are larger than 3.4%... in the winter, 91 with no ethanol gives me over 15% more km than 89 with 10% ethanol. The difference in summer is less, but still more noticeable than 3.4%.