Chassis Rigidity , Why Track a Vert?

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
User avatar
E7-S14
Posts: 5214
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:20 pm
Car: ess 14 foo!
Contact:

Post

Just a simple question that popped into my head. Figured posting this in 240gen wouldn't gauge intelligent answers or discussion, so I'll post it here.

I don't know if its only with drifting, but i see a lot of 240 guys that track their verts, and daily there coups/hatches.
my question is why? wouldn't the closed chassis be much more rigid? I know a cage is a structure addition and adds rigidity to the chassis as well, but wouldn't caging a closed in chassis be more efficient than caging a convertible?
I also see that S2000's make amazing track cars. makes me wonder how much more rigid an s2k chassis is over an s14 for example.

Or is it just preference? for those guys who track their verts.
Personally, i don't like s13 verts. the only few verts i actually like are s200's( but would prefer the hardtop addition) and M3 verts to name a few.


User avatar
Urabus GodofTraction
Posts: 6178
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:36 pm
Car: 2002 Subaru WRX Wagon
2004 Suzuki SV650
1988 Toyota Land Cruiser
1994 Honda XR600R

Post

The S2000 was designed as a vert, therefor it's very rigid. As is the Miata (well, Miata's aren't very rigid, but moreso than a car designed as not a vert). Throwing a hard top on them doesn't do all that much for rigidity, just protection.

The S13 vert is pretty damn flexy, I understand. I don't know why people track them, especially with many sanctioning bodies not allowing unhardtopped convertible to run.
Last edited by Urabus GodofTraction on Mon May 24, 2010 7:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
flohtingPoint
Posts: 3564
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 2:46 pm
Car: 2004 Z16 Corvette Z06
Location: Washington DC
Contact:

Post

Who are "a lot of 240 guys", where are they tracking their car and with what associations?

User avatar
Mr1der
Posts: 36020
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:35 am
Car: It's still not a Nissan...
Location: Lebanon TN

Post

ummm...Greg tossed his around some...but yeah.

how a car was originally designed is the biggest factor in this.

User avatar
flohtingPoint
Posts: 3564
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 2:46 pm
Car: 2004 Z16 Corvette Z06
Location: Washington DC
Contact:

Post

Mr1der wrote:ummm...Greg tossed his around some...but yeah.
Yea, I assumed Greg has thrashed the vert a few times. Including him, I can count on one hand the number of verts I've seen on or heard of on tracks.

seang
Posts: 2026
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 8:09 pm
Car: Ford Fiesta ST
Location: Michigan

Post

TVR lattice backbone looks good for vert:
Image

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

Maybe it's all they own? Maybe it's because people said it couldn't be done?

Ask Ryan Hampton why he's drifting a convertible 350Z?

Side note: I won't go into it in detail right now, but the S13 droptop isn't exactly the limp noodle that people think of when they think of a convertible. There's a LOT of chassis bracing in there.

User avatar
E7-S14
Posts: 5214
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:20 pm
Car: ess 14 foo!
Contact:

Post

flohtingPoint wrote:Who are "a lot of 240 guys", where are they tracking their car and with what associations?
lol few guys ive seen slide on the east coast.

and i can understand how s2ks are more rigid than some closed chassis since it is much newer than alot of the nissnas we grew up to love.

User avatar
simmode1
Posts: 7918
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 4:51 pm
Car: Red '95 S14
Location: Euless, TX
Contact:

Post

E7-S14 wrote:and i can understand how s2ks are more rigid than some closed chassis since it is much newer than alot of the nissnas we grew up to love.
The S2000 is so rigid mainly because it was designed with it's 'X-bone' chassis frame.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/e ... _frame.jpg

I think I remember SCC talking about the S13 vert's chassis rigidtiy in their 240sx buyer's guide. I vaguely recall them saying there isn't a whole lot of difference when compared to the hatch and coupe... :gotme

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

There isn't.

The coupe is the stiffest, but the hatch is minimally more rigid than the vert.

<prepares for the onslaught of hatch owners saying, "OMG d00d UR so wrong WTF y0!">

User avatar
s0m3th1ngAZ
Posts: 3856
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 10:11 am
Car: 96' Miata
2014 Focus ST

Post

Wasn't the 240 vert converted after they left the factory?

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

Yes. They were all born as coupes.

User avatar
Looneybomber
Posts: 9140
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2004 3:05 pm
Car: 02 explorer sprt (grn)
10 G37S (white)

Post

Chassis rigidity isn't the only factor when taking into account handling. Sure it has an effect, but so does suspension geometry and components, weight distribution, etc...

User avatar
krash
Posts: 4836
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 10:43 am
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx Convertible
Location: Memphis, TN
Contact:

Post

I use my vert for racing and stuff because its kind of my all-in-one car. I'm too broke to have a dedicated track car, and the vert is just too damn awesome to trade for a coupe or hatch :gapteeth: Its not all that bad really. I don't think you'll really feel the effects until you get very competitive. The only thing that sucks about verts is that most tracks wont allow you to use them unless the have a roll-bar or roll cage. You really can't deny the awesomeness of drop-top racing.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

Looneybomber wrote:...weight distribution...
Certainly a bonus for 'verts. Lower center of gravity. Same reason M3 and ZR1 have magnesium roofs.

User avatar
OriginalWheelman
Posts: 5668
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 3:38 am
Car: '15 Ford Focus Electric
Location: Portland, OR (or what?)

Post

MinisterofDOOM wrote:M3 and ZR1 have magnesium roofs.
That and the pretty white flame when it burns.

User avatar
Dano
Posts: 11535
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2002 8:01 pm
Car: '05 Nissan Frontier Nismo CC
'95 Nissan 240SX base
Location: Kansas City, KS/ Phx, AZ
Contact:

Post

I <3 S2k.

User avatar
Koshin
Posts: 14088
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 4:43 pm
Car: JP'd out Y32 Nissan Gloria GTU
750 hp '87 Buick Grand National
'63 Chevy Impala SS 327/4 speed
Location: ...in your garage stealing your wheels
Contact:

Post

coupe > hatch

a vert of any kind is stupid in my mind for a track car. But thats just me

User avatar
krash
Posts: 4836
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 10:43 am
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx Convertible
Location: Memphis, TN
Contact:

Post

I agree that if you were out to build a 100% dedicated track car, it wouldn't be smart to buy a vert. But it is pretty awesome to race with a vert.

User avatar
flohtingPoint
Posts: 3564
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 2:46 pm
Car: 2004 Z16 Corvette Z06
Location: Washington DC
Contact:

Post

Koshin wrote:a vert of any kind is stupid in my mind for a track car. But thats just me
Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

User avatar
Koshin
Posts: 14088
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 4:43 pm
Car: JP'd out Y32 Nissan Gloria GTU
750 hp '87 Buick Grand National
'63 Chevy Impala SS 327/4 speed
Location: ...in your garage stealing your wheels
Contact:

Post

lmfao

we arent talking AC cobras, and Triumphs and s*** haha

Im sure I COULD find a vert race car that I approve of lol

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

flohtingPoint wrote:Image
Image
Image
Image

:dblthumb:

User avatar
Infinitiguy19
Posts: 7787
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 4:58 pm
Car: 1993 Infiniti Q45 188580 Miles
1994 Infiniti Q45a 240000 Miles

Post

I want to see a old M30 convertible drift...I hear those cars are extremely weak.

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

S13 verts are heavy. Great for casual driving, cant imagine picking one for track use.

User avatar
wingFeather
Posts: 1819
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 10:08 am
Car: Current: 05 G35 Coupe
Previous: M35, M35 Sport, cube, J30, s13 sr20det, s13 rb20det, s14 zenki

Post

Tracking a vert is awesome. Why ask why?

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

Jesda wrote:S13 verts are heavy. Great for casual driving, cant imagine picking one for track use.
"Heavy" is relative. 2733 (base coupe) to 2772 (SE hatch) vs 2800 (convertible) is an insufficient amount to dismiss a vehicle.

28 - 67 lbs can be remedied by removing the spare and swapping to a manual trans. ;)

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

AZhitman wrote:
Jesda wrote:S13 verts are heavy. Great for casual driving, cant imagine picking one for track use.
"Heavy" is relative. 2733 (base coupe) to 2772 (SE hatch) vs 2800 (convertible) is an insufficient amount to dismiss a vehicle.

28 - 67 lbs can be remedied by removing the spare and swapping to a manual trans. ;)
Or just buy a used Miata -- better to abuse something with a million copies than a rare car

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

Definitely.

(altho some of us would prefer to not be seen in a Miata...) ;)

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

Bah. I could happily drive a pink miata. I'd be having too much fun to notice the color.

User avatar
numbnuts240
Posts: 32380
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:17 pm
Car: 1999 Ford Exploder 4-door 5spd
1974 Datsun Fairlady-Z 250GT
2011 Ford Focus
2010 Mazda 3
Location: TJ

Post

MinisterofDOOM wrote:Image
dat dare thing shore duz have a purdee mouf.


Return to “General Chat”