CBO: Choices for Deficit Reduction

A place for intelligent and well-thought-out discussion involving politics and associated topics. No nonsense will be tolerated at all.
User avatar
themadscientist
Posts: 29308
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:30 pm
Car: R32 GTR, DR30 RS Turbo, BRZ, Lunchbox, NSR50 Sportster 883 Iron
Location: Staring down at you with disdain from the spooky mountaintop castle.

Post

Light reading....
http://cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbof ... screen.pdf
Summary
The United States is facing fundamental budgetary challenges. Federal debt held by the
public exceeds 70 percent of the nation’s annual output (gross domestic product, or
GDP)—a percentage not seen since 1950—and a continuation of current policies
would boost the debt further. Although debt would decline to 58 percent of GDP in
2022 under the current-law assumptions that underlie the Congressional Budget
Office’s (CBO’s) baseline projections, those projections depend heavily on significant
increases in taxes and decreases in spending that are scheduled to take effect at the
beginning of January. If, instead, lawmakers maintained current policies by preventing
most of those changes from occurring—what CBO refers to as the alternative fiscal
scenario—debt held by the public would increase to 90 percent of GDP 10 years from
now and continue to rise rapidly thereafter.


User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 23925
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

Yet some people will argue that we don't have a "spending problem".

User avatar
telcoman
Posts: 5763
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 11:30 am
Car: Tesla 2022 Model Y, 2016 Q70 Bye 2012 G37S 6 MT w Nav 94444 mi bye 2006 Infiniti G35 Sedan 6 MT @171796 mi.
Location: Central NJ

Post

WDRacing wrote:Yet some people will argue that we don't have a "spending problem".
Yup

We need to be spending more to fix our roads, bridges,tunnels, sewers, railroads and put millions of people back to work.

When we stop spending on the two wars from Bush, increase taxes on the rich, and the savings from Obamacare the debt level will go down as it did under President Clinton.

What Obama does not finish, Hillary will in 2016

Telcoman

User avatar
stebo0728
Posts: 2810
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 4:43 pm
Car: 1993 300ZX, White, T-Top
Contact:

Post

I wonder, should the right concede to Clinton tax rates, I wonder if the left would concede Clinton spending levels.

User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 23925
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

telcoman wrote:
WDRacing wrote:Yet some people will argue that we don't have a "spending problem".
Yup

We need to be spending more to fix our roads, bridges,tunnels, sewers, railroads and put millions of people back to work.

When we stop spending on the two wars from Bush, increase taxes on the rich, and the savings from Obamacare the debt level will go down as it did under President Clinton.

What Obama does not finish, Hillary will in 2016

Telcoman
It would be cool if you actually said something that wasn't on par with pouring gasoline on the fire. How about we raise taxes to the Clinton era rates and also reduce spending to the Clinton era rates?

BTW, Obamacare doesn't save anyone any money. It does nothing but COST money. Your statement and opinion will NEVER see the debt go down. But I expect that from delusional people like you Howie.

User avatar
bigbadberry3
Posts: 2095
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 6:19 pm
Location: USA

Post

Spend more on cyber infrastructure, but less overall please :)

User avatar
themadscientist
Posts: 29308
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:30 pm
Car: R32 GTR, DR30 RS Turbo, BRZ, Lunchbox, NSR50 Sportster 883 Iron
Location: Staring down at you with disdain from the spooky mountaintop castle.

Post

telcoman wrote:We need to be spending more to fix our roads, bridges,tunnels, sewers, railroads and put millions of people back to work.
Agreed, but that was what Obamalamadingdong was supposed to have done last time. The only "shovelready" jobs he created was covering his own a** for the past four years.
telcoman wrote:When we stop spending on the two wars from Bush,
Agreed.
telcoman wrote: increase taxes on the rich,
They already pay 70% Howie. Pull your head out of your a**.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... are-taxes/
CBO, the nonpartisan agency that serves as Congress’ official scorekeeper, said the current tax code is progressive chiefly because of the income-tax structure. On average, the lowest 40 percent of earners actually get money back through the income-tax code because of refundable tax credits.

Overall, the federal tax rates in 2008 and 2009 — at 18 percent and 17.4 percent — were the lowest in the last three decades, suggesting at least part of the reason the federal government has run record deficits in recent years.

In terms of actual earnings, the top 1 percent suffered the most in the recession, with their average earnings dropping from $1.9 million to $1.2 million. The lowest 20 percent saw their incomes drop from $23,900 to $23,500 during that time.
telcoman wrote:and the savings from Obamacare the debt level will go down as it did under President Clinton.
There are no savings under Obamacare, dream on.
telcoman wrote:What Obama does not finish, Hillary will in 2016

Telcoman
If the GOP keeps coming up with dead fish like Romney, very possible.

User avatar
stebo0728
Posts: 2810
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 4:43 pm
Car: 1993 300ZX, White, T-Top
Contact:

Post

themadscientist wrote: They already pay 70% Howie. Pull your head out of your a**.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... are-taxes/
Don't bother trying to give Howie facts man. He keeps them in a well behind his house, and demands that they lotion their skin.

User avatar
szh
Posts: 18857
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 12:54 pm
Car: 2018 Tesla Model 3.

Unfortunately, no longer a Nissan or Infiniti, but continuing here at NICO!
Location: San Jose, CA

Post

Image

Image


Return to “Politics Etc.”